• randon31415@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    If there ever was a time to criticize the democrats, it is 3 months AFTER an election.

    If there ever was a time to not to criticize the democrats, it is 3 months BEFORE an election.

    • UsernameHere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      8 hours ago

      You think if we criticize democrats for 3.5 years straight it wont affect the outcome of an election as long as we stop for a few months?

      • randon31415@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Acknowledge mistakes and learning from them is the biggest advantage when running against the Republicans who think Trump can never make mistakes

          • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            It only sows apathy because they keep shutting down progressive voices for… *checks notes… a 74 year old with cancer.

            Maybe just maybe if AOC had been given a committee seat instead of being muscled out by Pelosi such criticisms wouldn’t “sow apathy.”

            That’s just one of many examples. What you’re saying is we should stop critiquing them since they don’t change, and their unwillingness to change and pointing that out sows voter apathy.

            We’re literally in a thread about how they refuse to learn anything and we still have you here being like “critiquing them only makes it worse!” Yeah, when they always ignore the critique to suck from the same wealthy teats as the Republicans, it’s hard for that not to create apathy.

            Like I said, if they actually learned something and centered progressive voices, maybe critiquing them wouldn’t create apathy but would create excitement?

            But noooooo, we just need to shut up about it I guess.

            • UsernameHere@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              49 minutes ago

              What you’re saying is we should stop critiquing them since they don’t change, and their unwillingness to change and pointing that out sows voter apathy.

              Nope, I’m saying Trump won this election because enough voters were apathetic and stayed home and the constant criticism from the left contributed to that.

              The constant ‘not good enough’ criticisms are the reason we are worse off now with Trump.

              We’re literally in a thread about how they refuse to learn anything and we still have you here being like “critiquing them only makes it worse!” Yeah, when they always ignore the critique to suck from the same wealthy teats as the Republicans, it’s hard for that not to create apathy.

              We are in a thread about an opinion piece. Sorry to interrupt your echo chamber but I need to remind you that the critiquing is coming from progressives: a group that consistently loses elections even after winning primaries.

              If progressives would actually learn something they would show up to vote in their own best interests instead of falling for the “Genocide Joe”, “DNC isn’t good enough so we get Trump”.

              The fact of the matter is not enough voters are progressive and progressives aren’t willing to work with any other ideologies so they consistently lose elections.

  • ZephyrXero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    The Democrats are over. If we ever even get the chance to vote again, a new progressive, actually left party must rise in its place

      • Stern@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Progressives won in states where Harris lost, so objectively, yes. We don’t need Republicans and Diet Republicans. We need two noticeably different parties.

        • dan1101@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          The voters that elected Trump hate progressives. Those are the the libs they want to “own.” The only way becoming more progresaive would help is if millions of people that didn’t vote in the 2024 election vote for the progressive candidate.

          • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Considering there were about 90 million (archived) who didn’t vote in 2024, that seems totally possible. Harris only lost by about 2-3 million, so we’re talking 5% of this group needing to be the sort of “both parties are too right wing, there’s no point in voting” types who could be brought into our fold.

            • ZephyrXero@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Reports are now showing over 4 million valid votes were rejected and purged by various voter suppression tactics taken between 2020 and 2024. Seems there might turn out to actually be something to the stolen election theory

      • Microplasticbrain@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Democrats aren’t left at all, they are effectively center-right.

        look at sinema and manchin, they led the biden administration.

        Its a big tent, and its drafty in here.

        • UsernameHere@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Manchin and Sinema consistently voted against party lines and were known for being republicans running as democrats. They consistently blocked the DNC. This is a bad faith argument.

        • Majorllama@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Ok so just for a moment let’s pretend you are now democratic God/king/ emperor.

          You get to build the new party of the left. What policies are you going to run on to garner support from the majority of Americans? I am genuinely curious what you imagine this ideal left wing party to look like.

          • Raise the minimum wage, implement a single-payer universal healthcare system.

            When Sanders was on stage at Fox News being grilled by their anchors for being “too radical”, Sanders turned to the audience and asked them if these policies were really so radical.

            The Fox News audience chanted “No!” (to the surprise of the Fox anchors).

            Slashing healthcare costs and putting more money in people’s pockets are winning strategies, especially if you can call out Republicans on their bullshit messaging.

            • Majorllama@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              2 hours ago

              So the only two things your new left wing party is going to run on is higher minimum wage (no specific amounts or percentage of local cost of living or anything specific?) and single-payer universal healthcare.

              Yeah I don’t think you would get the majority of votes by making a party based around only those two things.

              • 𝙲𝚑𝚊𝚒𝚛𝚖𝚊𝚗 𝙼𝚎𝚘𝚠
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                Yes let me just write an entire election manifesto whilst I’m taking my morning dump.

                These are just examples of policies that actually do something for the majority of Americans, and that seem to be popular across the board.

                • Majorllama@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  56 minutes ago

                  I’m not expecting a 10 page book of exactly everything you would implement and exactly how you would do it, but only answering like 10% of a question seems odd.

                  That would be like me asking you to list all your ideal ingredients for a sandwich and you only said “bread” then decided you didn’t feel like thinking of the rest so you just hit send and walk away.

              • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 hours ago

                That’s not the same person you originally responded to.

                I agree with your sentiment, but just so you know, the person you asked the question “how will you rebuild the party” is not the person who responded to that question and you responded to.

                • Majorllama@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 hour ago

                  Yes I am aware. But they did answer the question so I responded to their answer to my question.

  • Stamau123@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    16 hours ago

    In a last-minute move, they shut the event off from the public and even deliberately shared the wrong address for where grassroots supporters are allowed to gather."

    Lol, we’re fucked

  • charade_you_are@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Are they really failing to realize their losing strategy at this point? I think they just don’t care. They got theirs and fuck everyone else.

    • DrFistington@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      15 hours ago

      They need to pull a long shot, honestly, given that Bernie Sanders has said he isn’t going to seek re-election, I’d say nominate him. Even if he declines it sets the right tone. People need someone who can walk the walk, and spit that talk like hot fire. You have an easy and galvanizing message to get out. America works for all Americans, because we all pay out fair share… Except for when a small group of billionaires think they have the right to buy and sell our country and our rights. This class of ultra wealthy is like a cancer that has been allowed to survive and fester for too long. It is now growing at a faster rate than healthy society can maintain and it threatens to destroy it. All Trump appointed and nominated officials will be retired from their positions for security reasons, including judges. Citizens United will be reversed. Tax rates on the top 1% will be a minimum of 50%, regardless of the type of income. Universal healthcare coverage, and creating a socioeconomic state that supports workers to the point where the educated and skilled should be able to retire comfortably at 50. This will allow for new opportunities for younger workers of all types, and keep the American dream alive.

      That would be week 1

      Several hundred people will see change in the spreadsheet that