floofloof@lemmy.ca to U.S. News@beehaw.orgEnglish · 11 小时前CDC orders mass retraction and revision of submitted research across all science and medicine journals. Banned terms must be scrubbed. (Including gender, transgender, pregnant person, LGBT, and more)insidemedicine.substack.comexternal-linkmessage-square8fedilinkarrow-up162arrow-down10cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up162arrow-down1external-linkCDC orders mass retraction and revision of submitted research across all science and medicine journals. Banned terms must be scrubbed. (Including gender, transgender, pregnant person, LGBT, and more)insidemedicine.substack.comfloofloof@lemmy.ca to U.S. News@beehaw.orgEnglish · 11 小时前message-square8fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squarenotabot@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up6·5 小时前Would the journals be under any obligation to accept these bad-faith revisions or retractions?
minus-squareMidnitte@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 小时前The for-profit journals that are asking for more money, your asking what might motivate them?
minus-squarenotabot@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·18 分钟前They already have the money for the original paper, do they charge for retractions? I don’t know, but I’d assumed not.
Would the journals be under any obligation to accept these bad-faith revisions or retractions?
The for-profit journals that are asking for more money, your asking what might motivate them?
They already have the money for the original paper, do they charge for retractions? I don’t know, but I’d assumed not.