• Dubious_Fart@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d rather buy a product thats decent, and doesnt rely on waiting 6 months for the community to do all the dev legwork.

    • JackbyDev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, no shit, that’s not the point of the comparison though, goober.

      • Dubious_Fart@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        its literally what we’ve been talking about this entire time.

        and please, if you’re gonna insult me, at least be more inventive at it than a grandmother from the 1950s

        • JackbyDev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m saying that if the games just totally sucked and couldn’t be modded they wouldn’t be popular. Being moddable is a good thing that developers should do. When you say you’d rather have a good game that’s also moddable when discussing the comparison of bad games that are moddable versus bad games that aren’t moddable it comes across silly. Like, yeah, obviously I was a good game that is moddable. I also want a million dollars. We’re not just having a discussion about random things we want. I’m pointing out that the fact that the games are moddable is a very good thing about the games and those modding communities wouldn’t exist if it was harder to make the mods.

          Also, I’m not insulting you. That’s why I used a silly word to try and help it sound more light hearted.