• will_a113@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Yes! Slip the sound board guy your discman and $20 and get a perfect recording. I remember a few times where there were a stack of discmans and walkmans (Walkman?) recording.

  • FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Sony made some really sexy devices, but the format itself just came out too late for it to have widespread consumer appeal. MP3 was just way more convenient, and a lot of folks still rocked discmans like myself.

    That said: it was actually a very popular format for the media. I was a journalism student 2001-2005 and it was the format we recorded all interviews on. The radio station where I worked at had MD gear, but also used Marantz compactflash recorders, which I personally preferred.

    • wisely@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I had a MD player in 2004. I actually preferred it over MP3 at the time. With a similar priced MP3 player you could only fit a few songs, but with MD you could have several MDs and not have to keep overwriting songs. Both were rewritable if needed though. Both were filled the same way by being connected to a PC.

      • FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Well, if by ‘similar priced’ you mean: a very cheap player, it might make sense.

        But in 2004, I carried an iPod 4G which had either 20 or 40 gigabytes of storage. You’d need a backpack full of MD’s to match that, even if you put lower quality songs on there. I had my iPod filled with everything from podcasts, audiobooks, complete albums and enough random music to never hear the same song in a month. Absolutely loved that iPod!

        • wisely@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Ipods were extremely out of my price range as a teen in poverty. MDs were selling at deep discount, and the MP3 players in stores were 8-32 MB. And I wasn’t going to get money for the 32 if 8 was there and nobody around me understood the limitations of only holding 3 songs.

          Honestly I forgot that iPods existed back then because the price was nowhere near realistic. It probably would have been preferable to MD though if money didn’t matter.

          • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            MD always felt like a ripoff to me because you had to buy a bunch of overpriced disks from the sole supplier and then carry them all around in a little wallet.

            As soon as the first hard drive MP3 players like the Rio came out, MD was a dead end.

  • 0x0
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Nooooooooooooooooooooooo!

    where it positioned itself as a promising alternative to CDs.

    Well, to cassettes actually… or both.

    • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 hours ago

      It was both. They promoted the sound quality and ease of use of a CD, the reliability and ability to recording of cassettes and smaller form factor than both.

      • Nfamwap@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        MD was superior to CD from a portability point of view, especially in personal players like the Walkman or car stereos.

        I had a MD car stereo in around 1997. CD quality sound, without the jumping of a CD every time you hit a pothole.

  • cman6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I remember having that “net” version of a MiniDisc player, and I would have kept it but it was SO slow to copy music from your computer onto the device.

    Plus eBay had those stick shaped MP3 players for about £25 which could hold around an album’s worth of music, and transfer times were much faster; although slow by today’s standard

  • atomicpoet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 hours ago

    The format never made it big in Canada so I was oblivious.

    But I still have many Walkman models, and I love them.

    • reddig33@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 hours ago

      It probably would have dominated the market for a good while if Sony hadnt taken so long to ship mini disk storage drives for computers.

      • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Sony also could have let them play mp3s. The last thing you wanted to do with a poorly encoded 128kbps mp3 was transcode it to another lossy format. But nobody was sharing atrac files.

      • muelltonne@feddit.orgOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Never heard of mini disk storage drives, but now I have to search if there is one that works on modern computers.