• floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    So many decisions that are bad for the USA, bad for its people, bad for its businesses, bad for its global standing and bad for the planet. And the only answer to “why?” is some childish quest by bitter men to hurt people they don’t like.

    • Refurbished Refurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      The goal is to destroy government entirely so that a fully privately owned “government” is in control instead.

      It’s all about personal enrichment for Trump/Elon and their friends, and it has always been that way on the right.

      It’s just much more blatant now than it was before Trump.

  • solo@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    In representative democracies, every 4-5 years a government can be elected that changes policies to a totally different direction. This is a feature of the system, not a bug - so no surprise there. When the system is rotten from within, even fascists can get elected.

    For me, this is one more proof that reforms don’t work and systemic change is needed. As long as we (the people), don’t take the decision making power in our hands, this is what we’ll keep getting.

    • alphabethunter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      It’s crazy that in the age of information we still allow our democracies to be representative. Representation still made some sense 4 decades ago, it makes no sense today.

      • MintyFresh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        I’m old enough to remember when people had optimism that people, would, for the most part, become kinder, more intelligent if only they had access to knowledge and education. It turns out people are violent, self destructive, genocidal, but mostly selfish shitheads. I can’t help but feel we have the president we deserve.

      • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 days ago

        You really going to make that argument when people still voted for the dump despite having all the information telling them its a terrible idea?

        • alphabethunter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          Part of the problem is that they had to vote for someone. Representative democracy is a popularity contest. And the orange fuck had a lot of people rigging the popularity game in his favor.

          • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            Isnt…that what democracy is? Unless you want to argue the system is rigged to promote only two parties. But thats not a problem of representative democracy. Thats just the frameworkers attempt to stiffle the majority.

            • alphabethunter@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 days ago

              No, that’s what Representative Democracy is. You can have democracy without representation, where every single individual is responsible for voting not for representatives, but for issues.

        • alphabethunter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Voting for issues? We’ve had to vote for issues in my country in the past, specifically gun laws. People voted in favor of banning guns. It feels more impactful when you know your vote will directly correlate to a result, and compels people to discuss and think about their vote, and also to go vote. Voting for a politician is voting for the chance that the things you want them to do will actually be done. We could have legislators, professionals, responsible for writing legislation for certain issues, and people could read and vote. We could regionalize and localize politics even further, where each small local community should decide certain questions that pertain to their own community themselves. And leave less stuff to be solved at national level.

      • shirro@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        You think people are better informed now? The volume of information seems inversely proportional to the quality.

  • LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Afaik, my supplier is one that isn’t used by many in my area. Hopefully it stays that way. I live in a very red area and most people are against green energy.