• SebaDC@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    A) The Earth spins at the same speed. What you are talking about is the tangential speed.

    B) The tangential speed is not much faster at the equator than 100km South or North of it.

    C) The speed difference would not explain why they don’t cross the equator. It may explain (partially) why there are no hurricanes further away from the equator.

    • Maalus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I love it when people use bulletpoints to seem smart when they are so confidently wrong

        • JackbyDev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          22 hours ago

          For someone being so hyper pedantic you failed to realize they didn’t use anything even close to bullet points.

          • SebaDC@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            22 hours ago

            Wow! Tough crowd. Seriously, at least I explained my reasoning for why hurricanes do not cross the equator. All they did was make either wrong or poorly formulated claims without any kind of explanation, and then throw insults.

            Saying that “The Earth spins faster” makes no sense, especially in this context: why would the equator spin significantly faster than 100km away from it?!? And why would this negligible speed difference prevent hurricane from crossing that line?

            If you want to correct someone, at least do it right.

            • JackbyDev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              15 hours ago

              If you want to correct someone, don’t view it as an intellectual pissing match. You knew exactly what they meant.

              • SebaDC@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 hours ago

                Of course I knew what they meant, since I explained why I did not agree with their reasoning (point B in my answer).

                Since this moment, you 2 have only been aggressive without contributing to the exchange.

                I also tried to diffuse the emotions with humor (“Tough crowd”, as if it was a comedy show). I’ve explained -again- why I didn’t agree with their reasoning to go back to the topic.

                And your answer double downs on agressivity… I’m out ✌️

                In any case, you seem to have a lot of anger to pick up that kind of fight. Take care, buddy 🍀

                • JackbyDev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  Now you’re tone policing. Just accept the critique of your pedantry and move on.