Reign of Fire (2002), starring Matthew McConaughey and Christian Bale, is such a disappointment.

This movie had a fresh, awesome ideaā€”a post-apocalyptic world ruled by dragons. Imagine that: dragons returning to our modern world, wreaking havoc, destroying everything in their path. Humanity is left in ruins, struggling to survive against the new apex predator. Weā€™re just lunch meat.

What a fantastic setup. So how does it all go wrong?

The biggest issue is the world-building. Thereā€™s an old adage: show, donā€™t tell. Post-apocalyptic films work because we see the world as it is now, the ruins of what came before. Thatā€™s why Mad Max is so effective. Hell, even Waterworld, for all its flaws, succeeds in world-building. But Reign of Fire? No.

At times, it hints at the idea of a modern world reverting to medieval-like society, which could have been fascinating. But they donā€™t show any of it. We donā€™t see the broader world. London? Never shown. The devastation? Barely glimpsed. The entire movie is cooped up in a little castle, and we never get a sense of the scale of destruction.

Now, the dragons themselves? Cool, no doubt. But again, we donā€™t see enough of them. Weā€™re told how they work, but we donā€™t get to see it in action nearly enough.

Then thereā€™s McConaugheyā€™s character. Heā€™s introduced as this badass dragon slayerā€”a tactical expert who knows how to take the fight to them. But when we actually see him in action? What a letdown. Youā€™re telling me this guy somehow got from the U.S. to the U.K. with troops, tanks, and even a helicopterā€¦ and yet, he completely fumbles when it counts? If youā€™re going to give us dragon hunters, at least make them competent. And for Godā€™s sake, show us how he got there. How did they cross the Atlantic? Thatā€™s something Iā€™d love to see. Instead, they skip over it entirely and expect us to just accept it.

Itā€™s not just the plot, though. The cinematography is a mess. Whatever color filter they used makes everything so dark, I can barely see whatā€™s happening. I get that theyā€™re going for a certain mood, but come onā€”I shouldnā€™t have to crank up my TVā€™s brightness just to make out whatā€™s on screen. If Iā€™m struggling to see the movie, Iā€™m struggling to stay engaged.

One thing I will praise, though, is the sound design. Watching this on DVD reminded me why I still keep my collection. The audio mix is so much better than what you get on streaming platforms like Netflix. My home theater system makes a difference, and I plan to keep using it until the whole setup dies.

This movie was supposed to get a sequel, but I think audiences rejected it for the same reasons I did. It had tremendous potential. Personally, Iā€™d love to see someone else tackle the idea of dragons bringing about the apocalypse. Itā€™s just a fantastic concept. But next time, actually show the destruction. Let us see dragons taking on armies, facing off against modern military power. How would they handle something like a nuclear bomb?

Thatā€™s what makes Godzilla so compellingā€”it shows the destruction. Godzilla breathes fire. Heā€™s practically a dragon. He doesnā€™t fly (well, sometimes he does), but heā€™s a massive, unstoppable force. The key is that we see his power firsthand.

Reign of Fire had the budget. It had the effects. It had two A-list actorsā€”Matthew McConaughey and Christian Bale. And yet, Iā€™ve seen B-movies with better world-building than this.

I canā€™t recommend Reign of Fire. Skip this one.

https://youtu.be/Xd2hHvq-SEA

@[email protected]

  • Ech@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    5
    Ā·
    14 hours ago

    Your allowed to be wrong, but youā€™re also still wrong.