Reign of Fire (2002), starring Matthew McConaughey and Christian Bale, is such a disappointment.
This movie had a fresh, awesome ideaāa post-apocalyptic world ruled by dragons. Imagine that: dragons returning to our modern world, wreaking havoc, destroying everything in their path. Humanity is left in ruins, struggling to survive against the new apex predator. Weāre just lunch meat.
What a fantastic setup. So how does it all go wrong?
The biggest issue is the world-building. Thereās an old adage: show, donāt tell. Post-apocalyptic films work because we see the world as it is now, the ruins of what came before. Thatās why Mad Max is so effective. Hell, even Waterworld, for all its flaws, succeeds in world-building. But Reign of Fire? No.
At times, it hints at the idea of a modern world reverting to medieval-like society, which could have been fascinating. But they donāt show any of it. We donāt see the broader world. London? Never shown. The devastation? Barely glimpsed. The entire movie is cooped up in a little castle, and we never get a sense of the scale of destruction.
Now, the dragons themselves? Cool, no doubt. But again, we donāt see enough of them. Weāre told how they work, but we donāt get to see it in action nearly enough.
Then thereās McConaugheyās character. Heās introduced as this badass dragon slayerāa tactical expert who knows how to take the fight to them. But when we actually see him in action? What a letdown. Youāre telling me this guy somehow got from the U.S. to the U.K. with troops, tanks, and even a helicopterā¦ and yet, he completely fumbles when it counts? If youāre going to give us dragon hunters, at least make them competent. And for Godās sake, show us how he got there. How did they cross the Atlantic? Thatās something Iād love to see. Instead, they skip over it entirely and expect us to just accept it.
Itās not just the plot, though. The cinematography is a mess. Whatever color filter they used makes everything so dark, I can barely see whatās happening. I get that theyāre going for a certain mood, but come onāI shouldnāt have to crank up my TVās brightness just to make out whatās on screen. If Iām struggling to see the movie, Iām struggling to stay engaged.
One thing I will praise, though, is the sound design. Watching this on DVD reminded me why I still keep my collection. The audio mix is so much better than what you get on streaming platforms like Netflix. My home theater system makes a difference, and I plan to keep using it until the whole setup dies.
This movie was supposed to get a sequel, but I think audiences rejected it for the same reasons I did. It had tremendous potential. Personally, Iād love to see someone else tackle the idea of dragons bringing about the apocalypse. Itās just a fantastic concept. But next time, actually show the destruction. Let us see dragons taking on armies, facing off against modern military power. How would they handle something like a nuclear bomb?
Thatās what makes Godzilla so compellingāit shows the destruction. Godzilla breathes fire. Heās practically a dragon. He doesnāt fly (well, sometimes he does), but heās a massive, unstoppable force. The key is that we see his power firsthand.
Reign of Fire had the budget. It had the effects. It had two A-list actorsāMatthew McConaughey and Christian Bale. And yet, Iāve seen B-movies with better world-building than this.
I canāt recommend Reign of Fire. Skip this one.
I wasnāt disappointed in it at all. It did feel like it was restricted by budget, but it was a fresh take on combining multiple genres, and ultimately they did fine.
Itās not amazing, but definitely worth a watch. 7.5/10?
Alsoā¦
Youāre telling me this guy somehow got from the U.S. to the U.K. with troops, tanks, and even a helicopter ā¦ And for Godās sake, show us how he got there. How did they cross the Atlantic?
Itās been forever but Iām pretty sure itās mentioned in the movie that he crossed the ocean to find the male dragon
That would make OPās beef with it make a bit more sense. ā¦but also not really an immersion-shattering plot-hole or anything: my moneyās on he used a boat. Wouldnāt even necessarily need to be a large boat if he sourced the tanks and such from a US base in Europe. But even if it was like a an aircraft carrier or something, thatās still just a logistical haul that doesnāt really need to be shown on screen. /shrug.
Needs to be an HBO series. Scotland thread and American thread, then they meet up.
The big military failure would hit harder then, but also more time to show the early days and whatnot.
I enjoyed it.
I would say itās definitely still worth watching, though I do tend to agree with a lot of what the OP said.
For example, I love the scene where Christian Baleās character is telling the children a night time story and theyāre having to do it verbally because thereās no TVs, and he ends up telling them the story of Star Wars. It was a nice twist on the post-apocalyptic scene.
Seconded
Thirded
Haha, I only ever had a bootlegged VCD of this one, straight up ripped from a video someone had made in the cinema (including people crossing the projector etc). It was hard to ever see a fucking thing, but 13 year old me definitely enjoyed the concept of this movie.
Your allowed to be wrong, but youāre also still wrong.
I remember seeing it in theaters with friends and I thought āā¦thatās it?ā I thought it was really boring.
Do you all think that a remake of this movie would actually end up being better then the original?
Just keep this IP away from Michael Bay