• dustyData@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    21 hours ago

    NGL, I’ve always hated starlink’s proposal. They last so little time and polute the sky making astronomy harder and raising risks of collision. It’s LEO littering for a product that could be substituted with existing infrastructure tech at a fraction of the cost.

    • MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The current amount is only about a third of the total planned amount.

        • MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          It will be the largest number though. They’re the only ones that are bothering to do such a low orbit, because that gives you lower latency but means you have to have a lot more in orbit for the same coverage and they don’t last as long before the orbit decays. They can do that because the launches are basically free