• psyspoop@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    2 hours ago

    But I can’t pirate copyrighted materials to “train” my own real intelligence.

    • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      22 minutes ago

      Now you get why we were all told to hate AI. It’s a patriot act for copywrite and IP laws. We should be able too. But that isn’t where our discussions were steered was it

  • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 hour ago

    If I’m using “AI” to generate subtitles for the “community” is ok if i have a large “datastore” of “licensable media” stored locally to work off of right?

  • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Copyrights should have never been extended longer than 5 years in the first place, either remove draconian copyright laws or outlaw LLM style models using copyrighted material, corpos can’t have both.

  • rageagainstmachines@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    3 hours ago

    “We can’t succeed without breaking the law. We can’t succeed without operating unethically.”

    I’m so sick of this bullshit. They pretend to love a free market until it’s not in their favor and then they ask us to bend over backwards for them.

    Too many people think they’re superior. Which is ironic, because they’re also the ones asking for handouts and rule bending. If you were superior, you wouldn’t need all the unethical things that you’re asking for.

  • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 hours ago

    What if we had taken the billions of dollars invested in AI and invested that into public education instead?

    Imagine the return on investment of the information being used to train actual humans who can reason and don’t lie 60% of the time instead of using it to train a computer that is useless more than it is useful.

    • pogmommy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 hour ago

      But you have to pay humans, and give them bathroom breaks, and allow them time off work to spend with their loved ones. Where’s the profit in that? Surely it’s more clever and efficient to shovel time and money into replacing something that will never be able to practically develop beyond current human understanding. After all, we’re living in the golden age of humanity and history has ended! No new knowledge will ever be made so let’s just make machines that regurgitate our infallible and complete knowledge.

  • Daelsky@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Where are the copyright lawsuits by Nintendo and Disney when you need them lol

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    3 hours ago

    So pirating full works for commercial use suddenly is “fair use”, or what? Lets see what e.g. Disney says about this.

  • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 hours ago

    If your business model only works if you break the Law, that mean’s you’re just another Organised Crime group.

    • Revan343@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 minutes ago

      Organized crime exists to make money; the way OpenAI is burning through it, they’re more Disorganized Crime

    • BleatingZombie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Only if you’re doing it to learn, I guess

      Wait until all those expensive scientific journals hear about this

  • stopforgettingit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    God forbid you offer to PAY for access to works that people create like everyone else has to. University students have to pay out the nose for their books that they “train” on, why can’t billion dollar AI companies?

  • Shanmugha@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    60 minutes ago

    National security my ass. More like his time span to show more dumb “achievements” while getting richer depends on it and nothing else

  • sloppychops@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 hours ago

    If everyone can ‘train’ themselves on copyrighted works, then I say "fair game.‘’

    Otherwise, get fucked.