He expressed that a shutdown will favor Trump and Musk, so sounds reasonable?

  • artificialfish
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Pretty much. And if you take this view, why not go down fighting? Dems really need the advertising. Schumer is basically rolling over for big donors, and unwittingly opening the door for more progressive politicians to take over the mindshare in the party more permanently.

    Unlike in 2016, there definitely won’t be a moderate “Hillary bro” crowd in 2026. There will be the people who literally want to behead Trump in the White House lawn, and the AoC/Bernie party.

    • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I disagree with that take.

      Trump’s gutting of federal agencies has only highlighted all the things we take for granted and/or didn’t even know were benefiting us. With a shutdown, that all comes to a stop, and the workers who are deemed “essential” still have to work but don’t get paid. Remember the last shutdowns?

      TSA workers still have to work unpaid. ICE isn’t going anywhere. Think they’re thugs now? Wait till they’re not getting a paycheck and taking their (extra) anger out on their victims.

      And Musk/DOGE? With all but essential workers furloughed, I have no doubt the dismantling and fuckery will continue except now they’re basically running around with even less supervision than they have now.

      Like it or not, Schumer made a hard, but likely correct, call to see the bigger picture.

      • artificialfish
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        The budget is the death nail to those agencies so they are going away shut down or not.

        But if we shutdown EVERYTHING we might be able to show how stupid that is and make it temporary or get some concessions.