rainrain@sh.itjust.works to Showerthoughts@lemmy.worldEnglish · 19 hours agoCause-effect was always a broken narrative. Twice-broken when you attach a pricetag.message-squaremessage-square37fedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down125
arrow-up1-23arrow-down1message-squareCause-effect was always a broken narrative. Twice-broken when you attach a pricetag.rainrain@sh.itjust.works to Showerthoughts@lemmy.worldEnglish · 19 hours agomessage-square37fedilink
minus-squareFlagstafflinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-217 hours agoBut you’re the one positing a claim! The one making a claim is obliged to back it up, not the readers…
minus-squarerainrain@sh.itjust.worksOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·16 hours agoBut you aren’t demanding that I defend my claim, you are asking for clarification, right?
minus-squareFlagstafflinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 hours agoYou already explained it here so it’s fine. With that said, though, I would say in general that giving examples (the more, the better) is equivalent to defending, as any relatable example gives any given claim more merit.
But you’re the one positing a claim! The one making a claim is obliged to back it up, not the readers…
But you aren’t demanding that I defend my claim, you are asking for clarification, right?
You already explained it here so it’s fine. With that said, though, I would say in general that giving examples (the more, the better) is equivalent to defending, as any relatable example gives any given claim more merit.