• abbadon420@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      You do not have the right to organise a nazi party. You only have two parties, no others are allowed. One of them accidentally turned nazi. That is something completely different than “organize a nazi party”.

        • abbadon420@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          I that same sense me and my wife have a right to get pregnant, but I got my tubes tied.

          • federal reverse@feddit.orgM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Mmmh … You can start a new party in the US. If it’s really successful, it may supplant one of the two parties that are there. The issue with the system, however, is that all incentives are aligned against more than two parties being successful at the same time.

            That’s a bit different from you (cis male, I guess) becoming pregnant, in that you actually don’t have the right hardware (meatware?). I guess comparing with your 58-year-old mother-in-law becoming pregnant may be more apt. ^^

            • abbadon420@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 hours ago

              You seem to know your inclusive gender terminology well, why not inclusive pregnancy terminology? So, I’m talking about a classical man/woman relationship. Sure a woman carries the embryo and she does all the heavy lifting (pun intended). I’m not saying it’s an equal divide. But a man also shares in the pregnancy. We very much experience hormonal and psychological change as well. https://www.menshealth.com/health/a19529157/how-pregnancy-affects-the-father/

              That was not the point of this thread, but you got me triggered.