- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
A guy who works for the EU has proposed (in his spare time it seems - not in an official capacity) that Europe have its own Linux distro for European public sector use.
The plan is to base this distro on Fedora with KDE Plasma. I suppose Plasma is relatively similar to the Windows desktop, so it should be familiar for public sector employees.
Thoughts?
deleted by creator
Why debian? what puts it above arc or others? serious question btw
deleted by creator
Yeah, I got that. But how is Arc, for example, “close to corporations” ?
deleted by creator
I expect institutions and corporations to have an IT department that takes care of these things.
You cannot apply a personal user logic to IT infrastructure of organizations. For such an organization Linux distro the users will never deal with the package manager or any directory outside of /home.
deleted by creator
Yes, of course Arch. But ypu’re still dodging my question. You were saying other distributions were close to Corpos compared to Debian. We weren’t talking about the benefits or drawbacks of specific distros
deleted by creator
And I want to know why you think something like Arch linux is “close to corporations” in comparison
deleted by creator
Debian is frankenstein’s monster of half-baked things that falls apart and rots. Add to it absolute absence of any leadership and direction, where even smallest decisions take years (mawk/gawk/nawk), shipping broken packages for years, and so on.
deleted by creator
Actually you need leadership and direction so you won’t end up in current debian situation where they can’t decide on anything where there is three suites of helper utils that do same thing but can’t actually mandate usage of one. Where apt-get is still shipped ten years after apt becoming default and so on. It’s a mess.
So what you’re saying is that you don’t like having a choice.
No I am saying that there should be sane defaults that are followed.