• Dhs92
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean, we really don’t want a repeat of the Therac-25

    • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Still can’t believe it happened the first time.

      “Oh let’s just reuse the code and forget the hardware breakers on the machine it’ll be fine.”

      Like I have no ethics training but they even had a (human operated) control rod in the first chicago pile who trusts a radiation gun to a SOFTWARE toggle?

      • qfe0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        It wasn’t collectively known that software was hard to do right at that time. If it always performed as intended it would have made for a less expensive and perfectly safe machine. It’s the textbook case in doing software wrong because there wasn’t one that happened before it.

    • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I only learned about it from the “Well There’s Your Problem” podcast. Can’t believe my school never talked about it. We did hear all about Challenger though as well as a few other disasters where the lesson was “If you cut corners, or take chances, people can DIE”