Marine Capitol rioter gets 1 hour of community service for each of 279 Marine Civil War casualties

  • Ubermeisters@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Man I’ll tell you what, I got OTH discharge from the Navy for a WHOLE LOT LESS. What a fucking joke. Fuck this

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      He’ll be heading to Leavenworth shortly. The military always lets civilian courts go first, specifically to ensure that service members don’t get off lightly.

      This is like the $150 fine that the Commonwealth of KY will fine you if you detonate a nuclear device within city limits. They’re just getting the pennies they think they might get out of you when the federal government is done with you.

  • Rufus Q. Bodine III@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Hellonen, Coomer and Abate pleaded guilty earlier this year to parading, demonstrating or picketing in a Capitol building, a misdemeanor punishable by a maximum of six months behind bars. Hundreds of Capitol rioters have pleaded guilty to the same charge, which is akin to trespassing.” They got off way too easy for violating their oath.

    • mo_ztt ✅@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 year ago

      “None of them is accused of engaging in any violence or destruction on Jan. 6. But prosecutors said none of them has expressed sincere remorse for their crimes.”

      “Coomer bragged on social media about taking part in ‘history,’ called for a ‘fresh start’ and said he was ‘waiting for the boogaloo,’ a slang term for a second civil war in the U.S.”

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        The court martial he’s going to have is entirely separate from civilian legal proceedings. And I expect the presiding officers are going to absolutely throw the book at him, if for no other reason than to set a graphic example.

        And if they don’t, we’ll know a bit more about the dangerous personal politics of some officers in the Marines.

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      They haven’t been in front of a court martial, yet. The military waits for civilian court to do their thing, before throwing people in Leavenworth.

  • Rob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Now that he’s been found guilty, I hope that he receives a dishonorable discharge.

  • Melllvar@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why the hell are these traitors still in the Marine Corps?

    Dishonorably discharge them and cancel all their benefits already.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I believe they were also dishonorably discharged IIRC from the last time I saw this. I very well may be wrong though.

      • Dashi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I heard other than honorable but again hearsay. Would prefer dishonorable

        “As of Friday, all three Marines were still on active-duty status, according to the Marine Corps. But all three could be separated from the Marine Corps “on less than honorable conditions,” prosecutors said.”

        Doesn’t say for sure but that’s a exerpt from the article

  • massive_bereavement@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    So how much for betraying your country, your corps and the oath that you made when you joined?

    Well let’s hope next time nobody joins out of fear of 34 days of community service.

  • BertramDitore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m confused. Why did the judge use such a weird frame of reference for the sentence? How can you use casualties from one branch of the military, in a war over a century ago, for a case today? Seems entirely arbitrary and out of context.

    Like, we don’t sentence thieves in 2023 based on how many boxes of tea were destroyed during the Boston Tea Party.