• Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    23 days ago

    Is it easy to self-host immich so that it operates on a READ-ONLY basis with my images? I really only want to use it for the local-AI indexing/search, but not as a backup or photo management solution (Synology Photos works just fine for that).

    • BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      23 days ago

      I think you can use Immich external libraries for this, also to be extra safe you can just mount your external images folder as read only by adding :ro to the docker volume mount so that the container won’t be able to modify anything as a precaution.

      • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        23 days ago

        also to be extra safe you can just mount your external images folder as read only by adding :ro to the docker volume mount so that the container won’t be able to modify anything as a precaution.

        This is what I was thinking, too.

        Alright, looks like I’ll be setting it up soon! LOL

    • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      22 days ago

      Yes, that’s how I use it. It has access to a read only bind mount of my photo directory. The ML doesn’t write exif data to the images, just keeps that in its database.

    • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      Yes, and:

      You can point Immich to your photo uploads as an external library, too. Then make a cron job to rescan regularly.

      That being said, I now have my old photos as external libraries and new stuff directly in Immich. After using it a while, I realized that it’s just that good.

      • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        It’s still indexing, but seems to be working as I expect. I really only want it for the contextual search, but it’s nice to know that I can do more with it if/when I move away from the Synology ecosystem. 🫣

    • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 days ago

      You can also try out photoprism for that. Immich is best for an all-in-one solution as a replacement for google photos.

      Photoprism also has face recognition, maps, and many more features geared towards photography than immich.

      I realized after using photoprism that I am too basic for that haha

  • DigitalDilemma@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    22 days ago

    Recent convert to immich and hugely impressed by the software and project - one of FOSS’s shining stars. Good work everyone.

    • nfreak@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      22 days ago

      I just set it up this week, I was just settling with nextcloud memories before. Night and day difference.

      A few pain points in the process but overall was pretty easy to set up and even add 2FA (though I can’t say authelia was easy to set up to do so), and once it’s off the ground it’s super smooth

        • nfreak@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          22 days ago

          Absolutely. It was a pain in the ass to get up and running, but it’s running smooth with this setup. You can probably streamline and clean this up a bit but it’s working for me:

          https://pastebin.com/ZWex1xvz

          Also just to note, the caddyfile changes aren’t necessary for Immich, that’s just for any service without an integration that you still want to lock down. Immich’s integration is pretty straightforward once authelia itself is up and running.

        • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 days ago

          Would depend on what reverse proxy you’re using, I saw they replied with Caddy, I set it up using Traefik instead

    • univers3man@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      22 days ago

      My only warning for a new user to Immich is that it does not support chunk uploading. So if you’re like me and took a 1 hour 40GB 4k video, it will never upload. It will start, fail, and start over again forever.

      • pineapple@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        22 days ago

        Thanks for the warning i don’t think I have any hour long videos, maybe up to 10 or 20 minutes. But that is a very weird and annoying bug.

        • univers3man@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          22 days ago

          You’re welcome. It’s not a bug, but just the library they use to upload files doesn’t do chucking. There is a git hub request for it, but it’s not done yet.

  • utopiah@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    22 days ago

    Reminds me that now that all my data is processed (in particular the heavy ML part) I should move the resulting container data to my (much less powerful but always on) NAS.

    • jeeva@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      22 days ago

      If it helps, I have an ml container on my more powerful machine and have my Immich insurance pointing at that, then the local NAS container in order. If it’s on, it powers through (so I turn it on if I’m about to dump a batch of photos) and if it’s not it churns slowly through (e.g. if my phone uploads one or two).

      It’s super easy to do! Would recommend.

      • utopiah@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 days ago

        Ah nice, I was aware of the remote ML instance option but I didn’t know it was optional, i.e. if it’s there rely on it, if not still work. I thought it was either do ML locally ALL the time or do ML remotely all the time.

        Is it just an optional ML endpoint on the NAS instance pointing to the ML only container on the more powerful machine on the same LAN?

        • jeeva@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 days ago

          Pretty much that - the NAS instance is running all the time, and there’s a setting in Immich for the network address for the ML container(s) that accepts a comma (or semi colon) separated list, which is tried in order.

          The docs mention that you can balance requests, but you’d have to use an external method for that at the moment.

  • GargledBalls@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    22 days ago

    Immich is great, I host it externally for family to contribute to an extended photo album.

    It does seem to get weird backing up from my phone, as if it’s trying to backup items it’s backed up before. That doesn’t seem to show up as duplicate photos in the library though so hasn’t been a huge issue. Bigger fish to fry tbh.

    Right now I’m working on integrating homepage with organizr then converting it to use authentik behind the scenes, with users using their plex oauth to get sso to the rest of their services.

    Docker is amazing

    • ArchRecord@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 days ago

      It does seem to get weird backing up from my phone, as if it’s trying to backup items it’s backed up before.

      That’s odd. I haven’t had that before, but I also don’t use the phone backup feature often. I’ve seen a lot of issues with it that seem to just be random occurrences that aren’t widespread, and sort of just pop out of nowhere only on a small set of devices, so I’m wondering if they just have to improve application stability a bit.

      One thing that does drive me nuts though is timestamp shenanigans. Like I’ll have some photos taken on the same day at different times, and at a certain point it’ll just decide to label some of them in the timeline view as having occurred a day earlier or later than they actually did, even though when you view the image properties, it has the correct date.

  • zingo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    Is it still braking changes when upgrading to a newer version?

    In the past it felt like I was running an alpha version, which I spend more time fixing, than enjoying its features.

    • Luca@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      22 days ago

      It’s written all over their website that we have to expect breaking changes. This year they will release the first stable version tho.

  • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    22 days ago

    It’s only good for phone photos though. If you also take pictres with a camera, it doesn’t have any clear way to handle those.