• doodledup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    How does this work? What prevents AI bots to just solve the proof-of-work and enter the site anyways? It doesn’t take much compute to solve it if I can do it on my phone in a second.

    • qaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Those bots make hundreds of requests a second. Having to load JS and perform PoW for 2 seconds does have an impact.

      • doodledup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Adding some extra CPU compute or ASICs for solving puzzles will not slow down a bandwidth-constrained bot. Bandwidth is still the bottleneck and cost factor. With the current state of AI investments, I bet they will go to great lengths to scrape every little bit of the internet at whatever internet bandwidth they have available.

        • bitfucker
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Uhh, yes it did? CPU time costs money too. What used to take milliseconds now takes a seconds WILL cost them money. And usually CPU time is the most expensive one too while bandwidth is cheap.

  • popcar2
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 days ago

    Been seeing this more and more lately. It’s a shame we need such a nuclear solution, but it works reliably well. It takes a second or two to be redirected to the site you’re visiting.

    • Kissaki
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      , but it works reliably well. It takes a second or two to be redirected to the site you’re visiting.

      Do you mean it works reliably well in letting users through, or in blocking AI?

      Do you have sources or more information about the effectiveness of it in blocking AI? What else it blocks as collateral damage would also be interesting.

      /edit: Clicking through some links (specifically canine.tools) I have to say - it may also be effective in annoying me personally, and eventually exiting those websites. Similar to consent dialogs you could go into settings for and save with opt-outs. But it’s a barrier and user-opposing functionality.

      I certainly don’t see it as a simply or only good and effective thing.

      • popcar2
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Do you mean it works reliably well in letting users through, or in blocking AI?

        Both, check out this article talking about it: The Day Anubis Saved Our Websites From a DDoS Attack

        Looking at the statistics really shows how dire things have gotten with AI crawlers. The before and after is crazy. There are some other blog posts also mentioning they get maybe 1000x less requests per hour after deploying Anubis.