• southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    I wasn’t talking about accessibility, that’s just what you latched onto out of all of it. I’m not sure why, other than it being a part of the comment, but it was never the primary subject of the comment.

      • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m not arguing. I’m expressing my internal responses.

        I’m not trying to convince anyone, change any minds, and I’ve said so at least twice.

        I’m just talking about the general subject matter. It applies to the OP concept, but isn’t exclusively so, or directed at that as a primary goal.

        I mean, you get that it’s okay to be tangential, right? A post can be a springboard rather than the sole topic of discussion or expression. Hell, every response to a post is at least a tiny degree off since it’s filtered through a human brain before being responded to. It’s a matter of how far, or how broad.

        The OP image even purely about accessibility of art, it includes capitalist motivations for ai generators, which I did directly address.

        Not every comment has to be a debate. People can just talk, say their little thing and that be that.

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              It’s annoying for you to derail a thread with tangents, but whatever, I’m not a mod.

              But don’t fucking talk down to me because I was trying to stay on topic.

              I wasn’t talking about accessibility, that’s just what you latched onto out of all of it. I’m not sure why

              It’s pretty fucking obvious why I was talking about accessibility, because that’s what the thread is about.

              I’m so fucking mad now holy shit.