Hillary is haunting… In general…
Well, technically it could be reimbursement for something.
Now if it was just a ride on a jet, that’s totally fine. Absolutely nothing suspicious could happen on a jet you just hitched a ride on.
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
She would know, she was bought by two dozen corporations
Hillary is just jealous she has to hide and do it slowly for years whereas Trump doesn’t give a single fuck and do it the obnoxious way for 2 times more money.
But they can just write it off their taxes!!
I would think that Hillary having some experience in accepting bribes, would know…
So idk why everyone is doing the pot/kettle thing (with various wordings). She’s speaking from experience.
Corruption is probably one thing that Hillary knows about, and she’s calling it out. Doesn’t mean she’s any less guilty of being bribed, not does it mean that this isn’t a bribe for Trump, nor does that mean we should be unhappy at Trump and not unhappy at her for them both doing it.
My point here is, why not both?
So she’s basically Frank Abagnale Jr. now?
Oh no, better stop being nakedly corrupt Trump or you might get sLaMmEd again
Stats for this thread:
Comments about Hillary Clinton: 150
Comments about the president of the US receiving a bribe: 3
It’s her turn
Comments about the president of the US receiving a bribe: 3
My brother in Christ, there are a thousand other threads about Trump being corrupt full of people lamenting Trump being corrupt.
But this post is like hearing Al Capone chastise Pablo Escobar over organized crime.
I feel like thats an insult to Al Capone, he ran a soup kitchen during the Depression.
He also handed out turkeys on Thanksgiving and is the reason we have expiration dates on milk bottles.
Aside from anecdotal evidence, Snopes was unable to find any proof to corroborate this claim. We know that most major food labeling requirements occurred in the decades following Capone’s 1947 death. However, aside from infant formula, there is no requirement to label expiration dates in the U.S. All such labeling is done so voluntarily by food manufacturers.
When you share a little factoids like this, you don’t think check to see if they’re true, this sounds like it was designed to be shared and to be viral, but nothing of whether it was fucking true or not, Jesus, fucking Christ dude do better on the Internet
I didn’t know that about old scarface, I will be adding that to the list of fun facts right next to the fact that at least one Roman Emperor thought that he was becoming a god right between violently shitting himself to death.
What is your point? Lemmy is full of Trump criticism. It’s the norm. One thread shitting on Hillary won’t change that.
It’s almost as though no one likes her.
She had plenty of supporters, why do you think Bernie was shut out? It was just mostly the older and more centrist democrats, so not people on here.
Because the DNC admitted it in court.
Not plenty enough to keep that orange turd out of office the first time and putting us all in this mess.
Plenty of billionaire supporters, yes
Debbie Wasserman Schultz
She had plenty of supporters, why do you think Bernie was shut out?
Because her supporters run the party.
Your downvotes don’t change the facts, there was a decent core of supporters in the democratic party. You’re wrong when you say no one liked her. The fact that you don’t like that wing of the democratic party doesn’t change the fact that they’re around.
And there was plenty of people who supported her in the caucus, which was 100% ordinary people voting with their butt. It’s fine if you don’t like her, but don’t act like nobody supported her. You and the people you talk to aren’t the entire democratic party.
Nobody’s acting like “nobody supported her”. Plenty of people supported her, but she didn’t support them and so they should be called by their proper name:
fools
It’s almost as though human beings have lost the ability to prioritize what actually matters
It’s almost as though no one wants to hear from her anymore except a bunch of people who are so unforgivably out of touch that they think she’s a good messenger.
It might be a good point, but she doesn’t deserve positive attention ever.
This is a post about her and her tweet. If you want to discuss the Air Force Bribe, I’m sure there are thousands of simultaneous discussions happening at various points on the internet. Perhaps even millions.
Sorry that this space isn’t dedicated to that, though.
.ml never fail to take a criticism against Trump and whatabbout it towards a democrat
Because the democrats are also corrupt, fucking duh
Liberals in 2017, a mere eight years before realizing Trump Bad
If they didn’t suck so much it wouldn’t be so valid of a criticism.
Get your own fuckin house together. Then we can talk.
not good that your guy is receiving $400 mil airplanes
Hillary personally did more to put Trump in office than every protest voter & third party voter combined
We blame you for him. You understand that, right? In our eyes, he’s your guy.
Trying to make leftists feel bad about Trump doesn’t work. We believe (And have the fucking receipts) that it is the DNC’s (And the Clintons) corruption that is at fault that Trump is President. Again.
The Democratic Party died with Paul Wellstone.
You understand that, right? In our eyes, he’s your guy.
centrists prefer trump over anyone to their left.
Not my fucking guy. I don’t care about the fucking plane.
I want the democrats to stop pretending this is an episode of West Wing and play hardball. I want them to act like any of this matters. Because it actually matters.
What doesn’t do anything is finger wagging and gotya tweets. That kind of shit appeals to a insignificantly small demographic of Brunch Liberals and literally nobody else. They should be filibustering every single republican bill and denying every political appointment. Leadership should be stripping committee appointments and threatening primaries on turncoat dems. The entire party should as a singular unit be blocking everything they can. They should be aggressively promoting an alternative policy agenda with real tangible benefits for real people.
But they won’t do any of that. They’ll stand around cock-in-hand and wait for Schumer’s strategy of “give them everything they want” to payoff somehow (think trickledown) because the DNC is a corporation. They really aren’t bothered by all the disastrous shit Chump is doing because it benefits them too.
I don’t care about the fucking plane.
I just hope Boeing puts as much time and love and care into the custom 747 as they have done with the 737 Max and 777-X
I want the democrats to stop pretending this is an episode of West Wing and play hardball.
Dunno if you have watched it or not but I want them to start pretending it’s an episode of West Wing because the Dems in that went hard. I’m tired of the milquetoast responses and typical DNC fair but they also are playing politics and trying what they think will work.
Try harder halfwit
There are more eloquent ways to concede the argument.
Imagine coming to a text based forum and thinking not reading is a flex.
It’s an explicit attempt to troll
“I’m going to say something I know you won’t like and pretend not to listen to any response because my goal is to anger you.”
Frankly, if I was a mod of this forum, I’d ban [email protected] for trolling. They’re not even trying to hide that that is their goal rather than actual discussion.
It’s explicitly bad faith.
Yeah, centrists don’t arrive at their political opinions by reading.
deleted by creator
As sure as the turn of the worlds.
Looks at the Clinton foundation and the UAE
looks back at post
Huh. Funding dried up after she lost and wouldn’t have the political influence the funders thought they were buying.
Who’d have thought.
Did you look at the date of that article and think about it at all? You’re making my point for me.
.ml never fail to take a criticism against Trump and whatabbout it towards a democrat
“Yeah well what about your party’s corruption” is actually a valid point for which you have fuck all as a defense
Corruption is fucking corruption.
Calling whataboutism and not cleaning your own house is precisely what leads to loss of trust and directly led to the first term of Trump. EDIT: Along with explicitly and blatantly breaking their own rules to give the primary to Hillary (This isn’t conjecture or theory. They’ve explicitly admitted this in court and justified it by saying they aren’t a public entity but a private organization and can cheat if they want. Funny how they’re a public institution when they get free federal funds, but private when applying their own rules)
Democrats being feckless cowards and refusing to prosecute Trump for emoluments violations during the first term, and then failing to prosecute Trump for fucking insurrection on day one of Bidens Administration is what led to Trump term 2.
It’s been 9 years and centrists still can’t accept that no one likes HRC.
Centrists still believe Hillary was the most qualified and deserving person ever to run for president.
And there’s millions of them.
I fucking wish everyone hated Hilary Clinton. Then maybe she wouldn’t have walked into a NY Senate seat, much less the Dem Presidential nomination.
Centrists still believe Hillary was the most qualified and deserving person ever to run for president.
centrists just wanted her because she’s kissinger’s protege.
Woof. Ain’t that the fucking truth.
Libya, Cambodia… it’s all the fucking same to these ghouls.
Wasn’t that proved to be outside of tenure?
If only Qatar had delivered the plane to Trump on Jan 5th, 2025 there would have been no conflict of interest.
So you think that having a slew of money coming to you while you are out of power right before an election you are expected to win means that that isn’t explicit corruption?
I have this really nice building for sale in New York that I have to sell for a really steep discount. Send me the money and we can meet up and I’ll sign it over to you. My loss is your gain.
Seriously, this is the stupidest attempt to justify corruption I’ve ever seen.
Ba’al criticizing Satan.
He’s allowed, they’re buddies in Roman propaganda campaign victims.
So what does that make you if you take Satan at their lying word on who is ba’al ?
Don’t forget who started the rumour.
I think you’re gonna have to explain the lore for those of us who haven’t read the trilogy
The trilogy? No there’s like 15 books in The Wheel of Time series
There is only one book in the wheel of time, its just so long you forget where you were in the slog and then start over.
I agree, but what a hypocritical cow. Fuck off Rod Ham.
Rod Ham.
😭🙏
And somehow all the insults about Hillary have to do with her gender.
All these pushes to keep Hillary relevant is so tone deaf. Waiting for the day some doofus tries to tell me why we can’t find better representation from the 350,000,000 people in the united states.
Who’s pushing her? She posted on Bluesky and it’s being shared. There’s no conspiracy here.
Why aren’t they sharing my post from bluesky?
I don’t see her running for 2028… where are you even seeing this?
Sorry, did I say that?
No one is trying to make her politically viable.
Just like during her campaign
AY-YO 🙏 self-five
Who are these people coming out in defense of Hilary in 2025?
The people who aren’t so ignorant to think she is trying for office in 2028.
I said nothing about running her for office.
That was the impression I got from what you wrote as well. Could you try saying it another way? Because it seems some of us aren’t getting it.
Why do people want to keep Hilary relevant?
Right. I think a lot of people wonder about that. But you seemed to be driving at a point. Specifically this bit:
Waiting for the day some doofus tries to tell me why we can’t find better representation from the 350,000,000 people in the united states.
What did you mean by this if you weren’t implying she was going to run again?
So we can’t just appreciate the meaning of the words because she’s someone you don’t like? She didn’t end her post with “and that’s why you should vote for me in 2028”, she’s simply stating a fact.
Tell me you didn’t vote for Kamala because she was a woman without telling me you didn’t vote for Kamala because she was a woman harder.
More because she is deeply corrupt and her accusing Trump of corruption, while true, is not aimed at reducing corruption. It is done to distract from her corruption.
They allow Fox News viewers in here? Fucking yuck. Go back to Reddit brown shirt.
And you’re apparently unaware of the Clinton foundation and the UAE.
Go read some history books.
Weak, try harder
Never gonna “appreciate” genocidal imperialists.
And no, gender doesn’t make it ok.
“I refuse to acknowledge the veracity of knowledge because it came out of someone I dislikes mouth” is some real mouth breather shit. Go back to Reddit loser.
Just because I don’t disagree with her on literally every issue doesn’t mean that her words worth my time either.
I’m sure JK Rowling and I agree on something, but I still want her to keep all of her opinions to herself, not just her problematic ones. Because she has a hard time telling the difference.
I don’t want to hear anything from a hypocrite.
Then die stupid.
No, u
Ah yes the sound logic of blaming everyone in a country for the actions of that country.
Applying that line of thinking to WWII Germany would mean the victims of the Holocaust were to blame for the holocaust. As that would be an offensive and moronic line if thinking I think it us safe to reject it in both cases.
You’re spreading Propaganda Meanwhile trump is sending to death camps,.
Yea, you aren’t just sexist. You’re all the bigotry that is trump now.
Lol, we’re back to “any criticism of Hillary Clinton is sexism”? I could’ve sworn it wasn’t 2016 anymore.
I mean, it’s not like centrists have changed for the better since then.
No moron, we’re at the “words coming out of the mouth of someone you dont like doesn’t automatically make them false”, did you pay attention in kindergarten?
350,000,000 people in the US, all saying things that can be appreciated.
Cool?
Sorry, I said words. I know how that might upset you.
Shhh, go away.
~oh kay im leaving~
Nothing wrong with speaking from experience.
I would really appreciate this twisted timeline we’re in featuring the Clintons openly acknowledging that they know how corruption works from experience as a way to derail the current corruption train that we’re all tied down in front of. The writers need to demonstrate that they haven’t completely lost the plot or I’m cancelling my subscription
She also received money (@ least a million) from Qatar while in office.
She failed to report it, admitted it after being called out. It was part of the ridiculous show that won him the election.
She’s the worst person to open her mouth about this, as she’s directly guilty and tried to hide it.
Not 400 million, but a direct comparison with Qatar can be made.
Ah, the Russian bots are working overtime today to distract the left from talking about trump again.
We don’t really need to talk about Trump’s corruption. We all know he’s corrupt and none of us are arguing about it.
But when the person who was so corrupt she couldn’t win an election against the orange buffoon starts inserting herself into the conversation, accounts like yours come out of the woodwork to defend her using stale 2016 rhetoric. If there are fake accounts here, I’m pretty sure it’s yours.
Brother Russian bots are at least getting paid for it. You are in this thread “protecting” fucking Hillary of all people, with your life, FOR FREE. Who is the real idiot here?
Truly, there is nothing like sitting in midwest america in trump land and being called a russian bot. @[email protected] I realize a nuanced view is difficult for many.
Should I insult you before I finish replying?
Is posting a fact about the 2016 election, and Hillary Clinton somehow disinformation?
My point was, that the turd is being a hypocrite, in that part of his campaign in 2016 was capitalizing on her errors in failing to report external country lobbying.
There’s strong evidence to point to Hillary being wrong here and very much the orange turd. Two things can be true.
I’m not trying to what about the facts.
Someone posted a screenshot of her top contributors.
I recently watched a video discussing the jet, which played clips of him arguing against her doing the same thing he’s defending. I looked into it and found https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/05/13/trump-plane-qatar-comments/
As I noted in my statement which you replied to - It’s not exactly the same, but comparable.
If anyone wonders why I would even try, please be aware of this adage. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandolini's_law
seems the hillary stans can’t respond to evidence
What trump is doing is wrong also.
Where did I say it was right? I am just calling out the hypocrisy.
Clinton’s charity confirms Qatar’s $1 million gift while she was at State Department