• MisterFrog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    28 minutes ago

    My most boomer complaint is when people don’t know what I mean when I say “let’s meet at the eastern entrance of the building”.

    Especially when you live in a roughly compass oriented grid city, this is unacceptable.

    Kids these days

    (I’m not a boomer)

  • GenLe@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Deadass. I’m so done with subscription services. They’re so annoying.

  • vga@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    I wouldn’t mind renting software, if only subscription-based software was such that you only paid the money for the subscription. It would be a fine way of using something for a short term, and a fine way to get some sort of guarantee that the software is maintained.

    But you’ll also end up paying with your data that they sell out.

    • Camelbeard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Maybe for the short term, but there is software you use every day, for years. Some android apps I have been using since 2014.

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I pirated everything before they decided to make everything rental only.

    I assumed when I got older I’d be able to afford the software and they’d get there due.

    But now they want everything to be rental and I’m not down for that.

    • Leon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      This is me. I grew up “choose between bills and food” poor, and found alternate solutions to enjoy things. Figured that once I had the disposable income I’d stop. Sure, I did pay my way for a long time too. The thing that fucked me off the most was Netflix telling me that I couldn’t share my account with a student friend of mine. I’m paying to be able to watch on 4 screens simultaneously, who the fuck is Netflix to dictate where those screens are located?

      I still pay for stuff, if I feel that the service, software, what have you, deserves my money. I’ve paid enough for Netflix through the years so anything there is just me collecting my due.

  • KiESi@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 hours ago

    No subscriptions, thank you. I straight away turn down even free trial periods even if they are offered as a compensation for a CS ticket.

    And when Strava automatically set a bunch of users to Premium for a while, hence showing a “paid user” icon for those users (nice marketing trick though), I removed my account.

    No.Subsciptions.

    • andybytes
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      The most boomer thing is getting suckered into subscription services. This is like an upside down meme. I got no strings on me. And I’m a real boy. * Pinocchio

  • Bruhh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Not everything needs a goddamn app.

    Also, no I’m not gonna scan the QR code to look at the menu. Luckily, I’ve never had a resturant decline a request for a physical menu.

    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      13 hours ago

      QR codes are great. Make a website that pays money to your bank account when people enter their credit card details and leave the QR code on top of other QR codes like the ones to pay for parking.

      Its a crazy simple scam. Sure you might not fall for it but someone will.

      • Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Oh wow I just replied that QR codes for stuff like menus is nice, but for paying ? That is a terrible idea lol. Never seen one in the wild though.

        • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 hours ago

          In the UK a lot of them take you to a site that you order the food from and that includes payment. Replacing it with your own QR code is very easy.

      • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 hours ago

        That is a terrible scam, you will be caught in days when people go to court because they were towed when they paid on that site, and banks might well track you down out of spite.

    • bampop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Also, web pages that keep trying to force you to use the app if you access them on a smartphone, but then the app only has half the functionality of the web page

    • Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I agree about the apps thing but QR code menus are fine imo. Beats having to decipher a sometimes outdated, damaged, dirty physical menu with a terrible print.

      • Tamo240
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        QR codes are a huge problem in contexts like this, because they are easy to overwrite and impossible for a human to verify the legitimacy of.

        This means anyone with a sticker printer could slap a malicious QR code over the genuine one, and you won’t know until you’ve already scanned it. This could easily take you to a clone of the restaurant’s website for example, that instead steals your passwords or bank details.

      • hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        It’s just easier and simpler. If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. Besides, I don’t want to dig my phone, open it, and have to turn off a 1900 ‘legitimate interest’ switches or get told to download an app and let them install a camera in my ass.

  • NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    17 hours ago

    “Of course you can use our software with a one time purchase!”

    “We’ve been adding new features! To access our new features just subscribe to our premium subscription!”

    “You’re still a premium member, and you have full access to our premium plan, but some of our options have changed, and to make the most of what we can offer you can subscribe to our premium gold+ plan! Try out a free 30 day trial!”

    “Put your young in the payment grinder and your life and survival will not be put on the countdown timer! You need us to live, we need you to understand.”

  • BomberMan9865@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Fighting Oligopoly is not a “boomer complaint” they want you to say that because it legitimizes their hostile tactics and takeover.

    • andybytes
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      They say fight the oligarchy because they want to maintain the oppressive capitalist system that got us in this position to begin with. Capitalism in crisis produces fascism. We go through these cycles and it’s always the liberals that paved the way. Remember, they tell you what you want to hear and be careful what you wish for. I think they call it pacification. They are the masters at the sofist Uno card. Unfortunately, the likes of Bernie and AOC are really just sheep dogs.

      • syreus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        The only Boomers I talk these days are old hippies and they would disagree.

        Don’t generalize old people. Its irritating and aggravates our sciatica.

  • Artyom@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    22 hours ago

    If a software is not important, why would I pay for it?

    If a software is important, maybe I could pay for it.

    If a software is REALLY IMPORTANT, then I have no choice but to keep using it, at which point I can’t possibly subject myself to the long term risk associated with a licensed piece of software. A free software is the only viable option.

    • andybytes
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Our country runs off the buying and selling of nonsense. If we truly want to make America great again, we’ve got to get back to work, doing things that make fucking sense, not that revolve around the billionaires’ cock. These rich idiots have cornered the market that anything that actually makes sense never makes it to the surface. All the ideas that make it to our plate are nothing but coke-induced delusional garbage from out of touch clowns. They always say it can never be done. But if you look back in the day like I say the Cold War era, we did make it to the moon, but now we can’t even tie our shoes. We’re running on fumes the billionaire leaning over to smell his own brand, wafting in his own essence of nonsense. Like I’m not a military boy, but if you look into the whole issue with the military and the right to repair I mean all these people that toot the horn of stupidity are gonna get fucked too Like we won’t be able to win a war because we can’t afford it because the private companies won’t let us repair our own equipment. I mean that’s some dumb fuckery cuckery. Things have gotten so absurd that you don’t even need to appeal to morals, but just use juxtaposition and point out contradiction. Like we’re so far gone.

  • hefejefe@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Looking at you, Adobe. Creative cloud has sucked so much from me, but I need it for work.

    • andybytes
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I remember back in the day the year 2000 something I was willing to pay like fucking $400 for that shit, but I kept it forever. Now, I just question why I even bother with a with Photoshop. Wait a second, I don’t. I’m a man. I use gimp. Most of the features they offer are fucking stupid. Art and design is subtle and it is made for humans by Humans. I think these fucking ad agencies are gonna have to learn the hard way. Not that the herd is going to all of a sudden be a bunch of badass punk rockers, but people are just not going to be susceptible to it anymore. And then where do they go? I look at advertising nowadays and it’s just so gross and unappealing. And like, I have a hair trigger. Like, everything I am experiencing, I know is somehow a fucking lie. I move slower nowadays with my purchases and usually some form of verification like a human being is needed for me to buy. And just a side note, I use to think people that were suck asses and just, you know, tooted the horn of corporate America acted like robots. And I think it’s kind of funny that they’re being replaced with robots. like you’re a tool and now you’re being replaced by a tool. The whole model really is just lower the bar and shoehorn in nonsense. lowest common denominator thinking and when they corner the market who else are you gonna go to or just give up on it entirely and say fuck it …I hate suck asses. They’re nothing but a bunch of goddamn phonies.

  • SpaceCheeseWizard@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    Use Open Source Alternatives. You don’t even need to install Linux if you prefer a different operating system, just use the OS programs like Libre Office, Krita, or Gimp.

    Edit: AND THEN DONATE TO THE SOFTWARE THAT YOU USE SO THEY CAN CONTINUE THE WORK.

  • Bieren@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Not even just software. Fucking everything. They are making car options a subscription.

    • Leon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      They are making car options a subscription.

      They’re making money on this too, regardless of if you subscribe.

      BMW announces that heated seats will be available in their cars with a subscription model. That’s to say, you buy your car “without” heated seats, and then for when you need it, you can just pay a subscription to “unlock” it for as long as you need. Once summer comes, you can stop.

      Caveats:

      1. BMW saves money by streamlining their production process. By removing the option to select heated or unheated seats, they’re making production easier and subsequently cheaper.
      2. They’re still fucking charging you for those seats. It’s not like they’re going to give away heated seats for free and bank on people using that subscription to recoup the costs. You already pay the full prices for those heated seats, and then they charge you extra while trying to phrase it like you’re coming out on top on this deal.
    • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      22 hours ago

      This is my fear with dish and clothes washers manufacturers wanting to have wifi built into them. They’ve already gotten people used to using clothes and dish detergent in the form of little pods. I think appliance manufacturers look at printer companies and their ink prices and want a piece of that action. They want to play the same game. I’m sure Whirlpool would love it if you could only buy laundry detergent from them.

      But in order to do that, they need to have their devices be internet-enabled. The printer companies figured this out. Third party ink manufacturers figure out ways to get past manufacturer lock-outs. So printers need to be internet enabled to allow patches that will disable new third party ink cartridges.

      In my opinion, this is the real reason we see so many manufacturers trying to shove IoT and wifi connections into home appliances. Sure, selling your data to data brokers is a nice minor revenue stream. But the real prize is using that wifi to lock you in to buying obscenely expensive consumables for your dish washer, clothes washer, etc. Even fridges are at risk of this due to the water filters that many fridges have built in to them. Same with dryers.

      The manufacturers of major appliances are pushing like crazy to connect these things to the net. Their official line is that they want this for consumer-friendly reasons. Most cynics say it’s just a way to sell your data. I however think the real goal is to turn every home appliance into a vendor-locked piece of garbage that requires consumables priced like printer ink.

      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 hours ago

        If they make a washing machine that requires a subscription to their pods, I will switch to washing my clothes in a bucket using the cheapest detergent Aldi have.

      • hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        If I ever end up in a situation where I can only get ‘smart’ appliances, I’ll just start washing my laundry at a lake or something.

        • Leon@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Fuck it, if they do this I’ll go stinky as a protest. I’ll stink so bad that the politicians will be forced to regulate.

          • hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Go stand in front of a government building and spread your disgusting armpits. Use a fan to direct the smell there, or even better, go inside.

            Reminds me of how British politicians were forced to act on pollution of the river Thames because the Parliament building got unbearably stinky.

      • PolarKraken@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Great point of view and yet another strong reason not to just allow internet connections on every damn thing. One other huge reason - being forced to accept brand new (legally binding!) licensing agreements, long after the device has been paid for and installed.

        Roku was in the news somewhat recently for auto-installing an update that required users to accept a new license agreement to continue to use the device they’d paid for and had been using up until that point. And that license wasn’t a trivial change, it required the user to agree to forced arbitration!

        In other words, in a very real sense, they came into the house and modified the TV (not just the cheap little streaming devices), then turned around and said “Want to keep using this thing you’ve made a part of your daily life? That you already paid us for? Well, fine you can, but - we don’t want any of you to ever sue us, so agree not to or fuck you. Don’t think too hard about it, it’s your TV, just say yes and get on with it”.

        Wild stuff! And I guarantee it gets worse before it gets better. We need high quality FOSS hardware badly, I really hope we see that start to take off in a bigger way. I’m not super optimistic though, hardware being just a lot harder to iterate on.

    • Aspharr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      23 hours ago

      And there are people who just pay for it, which blows my mind. Companies wouldn’t do it if there wasn’t money to be had. So now we get nickel and dimed so these corporations can get a steady stream of income rather than providing good quality products.

      Apps are really notorious for it. What used to be a 10$ app now they expect subscriptions that amount to 60$ or more a year with no real noteworthy changes in service.

      Calorie counting apps, for example, have been doing the same thing for over a decade now with little change besides cosmetic upgrades and “AI”.

    • Sunflier@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Want to heat your car seats? That’s a suspension. Want to use your car’s radio? Another subscription. Get a higher mileage count to the gallon? Subscription.

      • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        22 hours ago

        This model should be straight-up illegal on environmental grounds alone. It’s particularly egregious for electric car batteries.

        Some manufacturers will make models with nominally different batteries, but in reality the same batteries are used throughout. There might be a model with three different battery options; 400, 300, and 200 mile range options. But the 200 mile range one doesn’t actually have a battery half the size. It has a 400 mile battery with half of its capacity locked out by software controls. That means the 200 mile range option vehicles are hauling around hundreds of pounds of extra weight for literally no reason at all. Such cars are pointlessly burning energy every mile they drive, hauling around extra battery that serves them no purpose.

        This stuff should be straight-up illegal. It should not be legal to sell a vehicle with software-locked equipment. Want to sell trim levels with different features? Fine. Quit being a cheap bastard and actually build vehicles with different equipment levels. Don’t build them all with the high-end options and then force those who buy the cheaper trims to burn money for the rest of that vehicle’s hauling around equipment they’ll never use.

        • Sunflier@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          19 hours ago

          If only we lived in a country that didn’t have exploitative plutocrats running the government.