• TheFriar@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Wait a second:

    it’s hard for apple to manufacture devices in a country with robust labor rights.

    Robust labor rights? The US?

    We have child labor making a comeback here. It’s not that far fetched to imagine children working in hypothetical US factories if things keep going the way they’re going.

  • Chozo@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    197
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    “Young Chinese women have small fingers,” the article reads, “and that has made them a valuable contributor to iPhone production because they are more nimble at installing screws and other miniature parts in the small device, supply chain experts said.”

    This 100% reads like LLM output; it’s confidently wrong, isn’t using proper news copy syntax, and got weirdly vague as it trailed off (“the small device”).

    NYT is publishing AI articles.

    • AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      102
      ·
      3 days ago

      Wasn’t this also the argument for child labor? “Small children can fit into tight spaces easier, lets use them to unjam dangerous machinery”

      • Bouzou@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yes. For example I know in textiles especially, they were small enough to run under & between machines to get things without the factory having to them off. (Surprise surprise, guess how kids got maimed and/or killed…)

      • oppy1984@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 days ago

        The right watched snow piercer and needed therapy after see all the horrible things that the back of the train did to their betters.

      • dan69@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Probably scrapped articles with “labor in Asia” to get this spat out

        • cyd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Does it? They’re a middle-upper income country now, and child labor tends to be an issue at much lower levels of development. Anyway, for the Chinese electronics sector, you’re vastly more likely to see humanoid robots than children.

    • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      70
      ·
      3 days ago

      We can’t claim that everything weird is written by AI, because there are weird human writers too. Although even if not AI, “experts claim” is such a dodgy source, that alone makes it untrustworthy.

    • kirk781@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Ah, NYT. Amongst all subscriptions that I have come across in my country, NYT is the most expensive. Since they haven’t heard of region specific pricing and just multiply by exchange rate; it’s only six times more expensive than YT Premium in India.

      Atleast I was under the belief that they had decent editorial standards but looks like that ship has sailed away as well.

      • thanks AV@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Boss I hate to be the one to tell you, but this is exactly what their editorial standards have always been lol

        • kirk781@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Huh, didn’t realize that NYT was disliked from before only. I thought it was a decent American newspaper. The only other American newspaper I can think of is Washington Post, but that is so capitalist friendly to say the least.

          Among overseas newspapers, I had decent idea of UK based ones (looks and judges Sun readers :p) but not otherwise.

    • venusaur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeah def what I was thinking. It’s strange that instead of admitting to this they’re just rolling with it saying it’s based off something they read.

  • Donebrach@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    yall seriously need some media literacy classes. or basic reading comprehension classes.

    NYT paraphrased some industry people who posited that Chinese manufacturing benefits from small lady hands. that’s literally just covering a story. they didn’t say “us can’t make stuff because we don’t have little china-fingers and only tiny-china-fingers can make the pocket computers.” they just reported that some unnamed assholes said that.

    • zloubida@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Follow your own advice then, you’ll learn that it’s the role of the journalist to qualify wrong and offensive statements reported, or it is implied that the journalist approves of the position.

  • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    133
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Yeah, that’s weird.

    The reason iPhones are impractical to make in the US has nothing to do with anatomy or genetics, it’s purely labor costs. You can hire someone to work for very little and for very long in China, you can’t do that in the US. That’s it. That’s the only reason.

    • Ogmios@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      hire

      They’ve been known to literally lock people in their factories, and even put up suicide nets to prevent slaves from killing themselves.

      • Doom@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        3 days ago

        Iqbal Masih

        Google this boy if you haven’t heard of him everyone. Two adult men assassinated a child for what he had to say

    • jonathan@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      That’s it. That’s the only reason.

      Manufacturing labour costs are far cheaper outside of China but the skills aren’t available. While labour costs are always a factor, the US just doesn’t have enough skilled manufacturing engineers or the supply chain you get somewhere like Shenzen.

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        the US just doesn’t have enough skilled manufacturing engineers or the supply chain

        That’s because it was all outsourced to China because they utilize cheap/free labor.

        If we had started doing tariffs 30 years ago we could have prevented that. Or if we enacted tariffs as part of a larger plan to slowly transition that industry back over the next 20 years, we could probably do that as well.

        But just slapping a 250% tariff overnight and expecting everything to sort itself out is the kind of a plan only the orange moron could come up with.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        The US had and has plenty, which is why manufacturing started in the US and migrated out once processes standardized enough to bring in less competent labor. Then labor became more competent, so more companies moved their operations there. A lot of US manufacturing engineers work with Chinese manufacturing facilities, because that’s where the labor is.

        If the US wants to bring manufacturing back, it needs to be cheaper to do it domestically. That means automation, better materials transportation, and cheap raw materials.

        I don’t see the point. Instead of bringing back manufacturing, improve education and focus on higher value work.

    • iopq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Chinese wages are not actually that low. In Beijing minimum wage is ¥26.4 which is $3.66

      US federal minimum wage is $7.25

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yet for these types of jobs, nobody gets paid minimum wage, even $15/hr is probably low. What is the typical Chinese employee making for this type of work?

        • iopq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          Also several times the minimum wage. The minimum wage jobs are the do nothing jobs like door man.

          The fact is, the difference is in concentration. You have millions of workers in Shenzhen all in the same area doing similar jobs. It makes it easy to ask one factory to manufacture a thing and the one next door to assemble it.

    • orclev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Well it’s also about supply chains. All the components are also made in China so you’d end up ordering the parts and then having to wait a month or more for them to be shipped to the US. If you want to avoid delays that means maintaining a significant stockpile of parts in the US that you may or may not ever actually use.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Sure, but I don’t think supply chains are the critical factor here. You don’t necessarily need local supply if you can break up delivery into small enough chunks, so whether it takes a day or a month to get a part isn’t important once the flow is going smoothly. You only need local supply if there’s a significant risk of disruption/delays.

        Yes, it’s probably a bit cheaper to assemble things closer to where they’re produced, but I still think labor costs are the determining factor. US workers expect higher pay, more PTO, less hours worked per week, and more benefits, so even if all the parts were shipped in perfectly consistently, it would still be significantly more expensive to assemble iPhones in the US vs in China.

  • BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    3 days ago

    Terrible journalism. The author entirely neglects the fact that lemurs possess fingers even smaller than those of Chinese women. Why not have lemurs manufacture iPhones, given the particular daintiness of their digits? A true investigative journalist wouldn’t leave such crucial avenues of inquiry unexplored.

  • baduhai@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    3 days ago

    “Young Chinese women have small fingers,” the article reads, “and that has made them a valuable contributor to iPhone production because they are more nimble at installing screws and other miniature parts in the small device, supply chain experts said.”

    Fucking what? Who are these supply chain experts? Did you pull them out of your ass?

    This reads like AI. I’ve lost any speck of respect I still had for NYT.

      • thesohoriots@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        3 days ago

        Their response is literally “he said it on a podcast,” and his comment on the podcast was the fingers statement plus “Apple engineers talk about this.”

        Go suck a railroad spike bud, you might as well have said that foot binding is the reason for good workplace retention, because Apple workers said so.

    • burghler@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      3 days ago

      You still had respect for it? It’s owned by and has been pushing Bezo’s agenda for ages now

  • jsomae@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    TLDR

    “Young Chinese women have small fingers,” the article reads, “and that has made them a valuable contributor to iPhone production because they are more nimble at installing screws and other miniature parts in the small device, supply chain experts said.” […]

    there doesn’t seem to be a lick of evidence […] that small hands are preferable for manufacturing small devices. The closest thing we could find was a paper that found that surgeons with smaller hands actually had a harder time manipulating dextrous operating tools, which would seem to contradict the NYT’s claim that small hands are an advantage for small specialized movements.

    (…so should they be hiring big white men instead? Not clear to me how this article thinks that’s a rebuttal of the ‘race science’)

    • Godric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      3 days ago

      I don’t really know what I’m talking about nor do I have a horse in this race, but could it be that small handed surgeons struggle with tools because the tools themselves are designed for big hands?

  • LePoisson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    3 days ago

    I guess the NYT no longer has an editor on staff? Who the fuck let that go to print, also who writes something like that into an article - that little paragraph where the NYT claims that “industry experts” said Chinese girls are better at assembling phones reads like cringe AI slop.

    I feel like literally one person proofreading that should have been enough for them to go, “maybe don’t print the stupid racist thing about small fingers.”

    • db2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      If it’s children doing it then it’s not racist anymore. – NYT, probably

    • flandish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      capitalist mutual masturbation and manufactured cognitive dissonance / distraction so they don’t have to actually change anything and effect profit potential. while they wait for daddy dictator trump to open their proposals in the form of a cotton sack with a dollar sign on the side.

    • misteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      They will fire the editor and writer (who are probably overworked and forced to use AI slop to meet deadlines), and the cycle begins anew.

  • orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    3 days ago

    “Grown ass men with sausage fingers are also out there painting tiny dolls using nail art brushes so they can play house… with their friends,” Jeong joked. “American men have plenty of manual dexterity.”

    OH, man. I feel attacked. I’m going to cry onto my D&D minis now.

  • carrion0409@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I wipe my ass with NYT these days. All they’ve been publishing is straight garbage

    • turtlesareneat@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s been the punchline of a dark joke for years.

      You gotta get those little hands building the little toys.

      We make the dark joke because we know it’s true, but we can collectively point at a tech company and say it’s their fault, and still enjoy the fruits of their labor at prices we can afford.

      Globalism - hyperglobal capitalism - is all about externalizing the negativities and internalizing the positives.

  • Blade9732@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 days ago

    So, NYT, do the Swiss all have micro hands? How do you explain Swiss watchmaking? For that matter, how about American watchmaking? America used to make all kinds of tiny wristwatches, including movements. There is also a few current American watchmakers, with a few building intricate movements.

  • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    As with most news source, I take them with a grain of salt. Especially when the news sources are owned by billionaires who have financial incentive to twist public media