We have heard you. We apologize for the confusion and angst the runtime fee policy we announced on Tuesday caused. We are listening, talking to our team members, community, customers, and partners, and will be making changes to the policy. We will share an update in a couple of days. Thank you for your honest and critical feedback.

Direct Twitter link

  • amio@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    they really only have themselves to blame […] research your vendor’s financial strategy - that’s basic due diligence

    Really? They really only have themselves to blame for Unity suddenly making a drastic and poorly thought out change to their pricing policies? Researching with what, a crystal ball?

    • Hector_McG
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      44
      ·
      1 year ago

      What did they think Unity’s investors plans were, to endlessly subsidise a constantly loss-making platform just for the fun of it?

      • Blueberrydreamer@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        Changing the pricing structure would be a perfectly understandable and predictable outcome. Unity choosing to adopt a wildly unfair and entirely unprecedented pricing model is definitely not something their customers could have expected.

        • jarfil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why not? And how is it even “unfair”? They want to charge for every copy sold, that was made using, and is still using, their software.

          People who compare this to Visual Studio vs. the MSVC DLLs, are forgetting all the privative libraries which charge for every copy they get released with.

          Unity is pulling one of those; only because they didn’t before, doesn’t make it “unfair”, just a dick move.