• rzlatic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      1 year ago

      their namecalling and pointing fingers into others, too often ends up as a projection, while their pro-something claims too often ends up being flat opposite.

    • RavenFellBlade@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve said this 1,000 times, and I’ll repeat it as often as I need to.

      The Left is arguing Human Rights. The Right is arguing Property Rights. Conservative values are very clear that women are not seen as independent individuals, but as property of their fathers and then their husbands. Women are chattel. This mentality permeates and pervades every aspect of Conservative ideology where women are concerned. Men must protect women. Not because it benefits the woman, though they will tell women that they should be grateful for the protection. Men must protect their property, they must protect their investment in that woman. It’s important to understand that Conservatives view all non-white, non-male, queer, and non-Conservatives as inherently inferior, requiring their guidance and control to conform to their superior ideology, or extermination if they refuse.

      View everything they say and do through that lens, and everything makes perfect sense.

        • RavenFellBlade@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          This conclusion has nothing to do with the internet. It comes from having to live with these people. It comes from having their vitriol literally screamed in my face. The internet is somehow more sane than the reality I have to live in most days.

          • protovack@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            that sucks im sorry. not all of us are like that. i became a christian while tripping on psychedelics. jesus said we are all made perfect in the image of our creator and that we aren’t to judge anyone as god will sort it out later. “vitriol” was never a part of the gospel. however, i must also point out that you are just as capable of judging and hurting people as anyone else. i would humbly suggest that your paragraph above is highly judgemental, lumps large groups of well-meaning people in with extremists, and is not an example of the tolerance and open-mindedness that you value. would you like to hear about my psychedelic experiences where i found god?

            • RavenFellBlade@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I can understand why you might feel that way, as I did use some generalities. I don’t take issue with people of faith, being one myself. I take issue with bigots, idolaters and hypocrites who pay lip service to their “faith” while using cherry picked and deliberate misquotes of scripture to harm others. Especially when those same people can rarely ever directly quote any of Jesus’ direct commandments. They sure can quote Paul, though.

    • Ragdoll X@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      100%. There are plenty of studies showing that supposed “pro-life” sentiment explains little of the left-right difference in abortion support.

      A 2014 study analyzed the data of more than 7400 people and found that “perceptions of preborn humanness explained very little of right–left differences in abortion support, and the association between preborn humanness perceptions and abortion opposition was no stronger for those on the political right (vs. left).”4 And a 2022 poll by Pew also found that a third of Americans simultaneously believe that a fetus is a person with rights and that the decision to abort should be up to the woman. This means that the majority of people who believe that life starts at conception (about 59%) still believe that women should have the right to an abortion.10

      By contrast, a 2017 study found that sexism accounted for 30% to 70% of the left-right difference in abortion stance even after controlling for other relevant variables.5 An earlier study found that authoritarianism had a significant correlation with an anti-abortion position and aggression towards women,6 and a 2019 study found that right-wing authoritarianism had a significant correlation with anti-abortion stigma both before and after controlling for other variables.7

      Perhaps unsurprisingly states that restrict abortions also have worse health outcomes for women and children.

      • PRUSSIA_x86@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        That sounds right, but I wonder how they measured things like sexiam and authoritarianism. If it’s measurable, I would be interested to see how it corresponds with other political positions.

        • buddhabound@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Probably with questions like “Should women be able to start a bank account without permission of their husband?” or something along those lines for sexism, and some sort of question that determines whether a ruler should be able to enact policies against the majority of the vote, etc.

    • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yup Republican, conservative, neoliberal, and capitalist need women to be brood sows and the young to be poor and uneducated. It’s the only way their economic and political systems work.

      • oodarthvader@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s funny you mention brood sows as one of the Idaho legislaters directly compared women’s reproduction to that of cows

        https://jezebel.com/idaho-lawmaker-i-have-opinions-on-the-womens-health-th-1849984572 To quote him directly:

        “I’ve milked a few cows, spent most of my time walking behind lines of cows, so if you want some ideas on repro and the women’s health thing, I have some definite opinions,” Nelsen said, before having a little chuckle to himself.

        • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          These states will quickly become women dead zones, like India and China. The moment women are able to leave, they will! Republican men already cry about the dating scene, just wait until ~50% of all women move away when they turn 18. The first civil war was fought over run away slaves, the second one will be over run away women.

    • YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      133
      ·
      1 year ago

      Conservatives throughout history adore the dark ages of Europe. That was the peak of their power; the population was uneducated, worshiped the wealthy as kings and queens, and the people were too poor and stupid to do anything about it.

        • fubo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not only hierarchical church groups that can be repressive.

          The witch-hanging Puritans of New England were Congregationalists, who recognize no church authority higher than the congregation itself – but who compelled everyone in their colonies to pay church taxes and attend services. Likewise, the Southern Baptists – a denomination literally created to defend the sanctity of slavery – don’t have bishops or a church hierarchy.

          Meanwhile the Episcopalians do have a church hierarchy (originally rooted in the Church of England, founded by Henry VIII), but are generally considered the most liberal of the “mainstream Protestant” churches.

          • Billiam@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Any given church denomination may not be hierarchical, but conservatism itself (and thus conservative denominations) favor rigid social hierarchies. The church itself, as the deliverer of God’s word on earth and thus the sole arbiter of what’s moral and right, naturally should be at the top of that hierarchy.

            You know, as long as you don’t belong to one of those other denominations. They’re heretics.

    • agent_flounder@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because the rabid right has been on a campaign for the last 50+ years to regain control and regress the country to a time before the civil rights era and before Roe v Wade. They’ve followed a multi-pronged attack strategy. They spread propaganda via right wing AM talk radio and then Fox News, and so on. They sidled up to the Christian right wing. They have fought against school funding and fought against teaching science and have dictated a conservative biased curriculum (TX). They have groomed judges and justices and influenced their appointment. They attacked the middle class and funneled that wealth to the ultra rich. They instituted voter suppression and outrageous gerrymandering. And on and on.

      Half a century of that and the rest of us are fighting for our democracy and our lives against the rise of the extremist right wing (aka fascism).

    • remotelove@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      1 year ago

      Religion and religion mixed with politics, mostly.

      It’s weird because conservative christians are some of the most evil people I know. It doesn’t make sense.

      • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        1 year ago

        The difference between an atheist and a christian fundamentalist is that the atheist is at least honest about not believing in Christ.

      • theuberwalrus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It makes perfect sense. Evangelical Christianity states that you are saved as long as you believe in Jesus. Evil or good, it doesn’t matter.

    • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The supreme Court was quoting 12th century English common law in support for the abolition of roe versus Wade, if that tells you anything.

      Also they want to “increase the supply of toddlers infants” for the domestic US adoption industry, which was also in Alitos opinion.

      And, you know what they say about opinions…

      • just_change_it@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        WE NEED MORE BABIES! KEEP THOSE FOREIGNERS AND THEIR CHILDREN OUT. AMERICAN VALUES AND GOOD CHRISTIAN LIVING ARE ALL WE NEED!!! Sincerely, the hypocritical crazies who prey on fear, hatred and ignorance.

      • Billiam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        And, you know what they say about opinions…

        “Opinions are like assholes- nine of them sit on the Supreme Court, but six of them are on the Supreme Court”?

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        “We hate the British so much that we’ll wage war against them to get our independence!”

        “Yeah so we’ll use British laws to justify our bigotry…”

      • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        They also seem keen to bring back child labor, so maybe they want fodder for that, too. What Carlin called “obedient workers”.

    • Diplomjodler@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because otherwise people might get silly ideas about equality and the state owing then a decent standard of living.

    • asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Think of education. Back before the Internet and smartphones took off, education was distributed. The most centralization we had was curriculums per state. TV was the closest thing to the Internet, and because it was all we had, it was a huge money maker. There was lots of quality content on there, including educational stuff like Reading Rainbow, Sesame Street, Bill Nye the Science Guy… I could go in for a long time.

      Once the Internet took over our lives, TV went to hell, and YouTube and social media took over. These were no longer curated or created with the same goals as the TV shows of the 90s. They are random people seeking attention, sucking in people so well that it pulled everyone down into a kind of sludge of stupidity. Instead of attracting people with dinosaurs, exploration to outer space, imagination, etc. they have Mr. Beast and others with their mouths wide open and spending a million dollars at a grocery store.

      These are all English videos, so the barrier to entry for the US is very low compared to the rest of the world. They’re also American culture, so it resonates with Americans more.

      Europe also has far better education systems than the US, so that goes a long way in resisting this kind of stuff.

      America is self imploding because of its own narcissism, and the Internet is feeding into that and having a snowball effect. There is no regulation of ideas there.

      It’s very similar to the dark ages because of someone just makes shit up, like “cure this disease by letting a leech suck some blood out of you” and enough people repeat it without being put in check by a higher authority, then it’s adopted as a common belief.

      That’s the other part of this: politics is usually taboo to discuss with people here, at least many polite people think so. It’s a touchy subject, so you’re taught to not being up these things with friends or coworkers, which just creates even more of a vacuum.

  • n2burns@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    1 year ago

    “The Bible is clear, and the history of Christendom broadly is clear, that it’s the church’s responsibility to meet the needs of the poor and to ensure that people have the services that they need to live flourishing lives,” Conzatti said.

    Besides just the practical craziness of the idea that you have to belong to a church to get social services, I don’t think the Bible makes it clear at all that social services are the church’s responsibility and not the state’s.

    • El Barto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The Bible is filled with a lot of contradicting bullshit. Anyone using it to tout some idea can be knocked down with some other passage in it as well.

  • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    But Blaine Conzatti, president of the Idaho Family Policy Center and a leading anti-abortion lobbyist, is not bothered by the lack of government support. Pregnancies, births and child care are not the purview of the government, he said, but of families, communities, charities and, most of all, churches.

    See? See the pivot there? Look carefully!

    Pregnancies, births, and childcare are not the purview of the gov’t. …Except that pregnancy is the purview of the gov’t when it comes to the right to terminate an unwanted or unviable pregnancy. It’s clear and obvious hypocrisy. from the religious crowd.

    • agent_flounder@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly.

      They’re regressive reactionaries. They’re reacting to the sexual revolution where women were freed from controlling patriarchal social mores around sex and relationships.

      Before The Pill and Roe v Wade, women and their relationships and choice of partners was controlled by men or at least the patriarchy. Fathers guarded women’s chastity, peers and society at large enforced social mores with threat of shame, rejection, and ostracism.

      The regressives want that all back. Sanctity of life is what many anti-abortionists claim. But you often see anti-abortionists talk about abortion in terms of (their idea of) sexual morality of women and they talk about pregnancy like it is some kind of “pUnIshMeNT fOr SiNniNg”. With the double-standard assumed, of course, because of their misogynistic worldview.

  • MagicShel
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    1 year ago

    Turns out you don’t have to support new mothers to encourage childbirth if you just ban the alternative. Forced birth without the courtesy of a reach-around.

    Of course, that dampens the mood for consensual sex a bit so they’ll just need to tone down some laws and look the other way on issues of sex trafficking and xl child brides…

    Republicans have become just the absolute worst and condemn things while taking active steps to ensure they happen. Much like abortion. Best way to reduce abortion rates is sex education and birth control, but you can’t reduce abortion like that! No, ban birth control, give no support to new mothers, and then act outraged when coat hanger abortions make a big resurgence and blame the women like somehow no one could predict exactly what would happen.

    • SoylentBlake@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Blame the dead women, you mean.

      Roe was passed based on privacy, which is reason enough, imo. People don’t need to know other people’s business and some dipshit busybody aspiring HOA presidents opinion shouldn’t even be in the same conversation as a medical professionals.

      Roe passed the court on privacy but Roe passed public opinion because of the many many deaths from back alley alternatives. Roe was about saving women’s lives. Conservatives can bemoan the lost fetuses but losing the women is worse. The women cant go on and have other children if they’re dead.

      My grandmother was taught by her mother. My mother by my grandmother. My sisters were spared this dark legacy thanks to Roe.

      I mentioned Roe and privacy one time around my Grandmother. Unbeknownst to me, gran used to protest and I’m supposing, burn her bra’s, cuz she went red immediately and set me right. The kind of mad that made my mom admonish me even tho she didn’t even hear what I said, it was just THAT tone. Grandma only got that fired up one other time- when I said McCartney was more talented than Lennon, but I’ll die on that hill, sorry Gran.

        • SoylentBlake@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Harrison wrote all my favorite Beatles songs. I wrote em out when I was in my late teens and looked it up, every single one written by Harrison.

  • calypsopub@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    To these people, raising an unwanted child in poverty with no support is a just punishment for the high crime of a woman daring to enjoy sex. They are totally willing to sacrifice the child in order to hopefully make that whore’s life difficult.

  • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Back in the day, I’d get a sim into a room, then replace the door with wall and wait for them to cry about having to pee. Then laugh my ass off when the sim eventually peed on the floor… I can’t say what made me think of that.

    These politicians are probably a bit older than me, so perhaps they used to get their rocks off with a magnifier and an ant hill.