Found this post super informative as it relates to Mastodon, and thought Lemmy might also benefit from this perspective. I’m not sure I share his optimism, but his points seem sound to dampen some of the alarm bells over Meta joining the Fediverse.

    • Vlyn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Marketing and content boost for the start maybe? Mastodon has come up a lot recently (hell, even in local radio), so Meta can use this to promote their own product. And already have content right there for users joining Threads, it’s not a blank slate.

      After the initial boost and when sucking up millions of users they can just defederate and have their Facebook (or rather Twitter) 2.0.

    • Sl00k
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Extra data to scrape through their servers.

    • SamC@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Probably partly to avoid regulatory scrutiny. They can say they’re not being monopolistic (even though they 100% are) because they’re embracing open standards.

      That’s why they’re not launching in the EU.