• Noxy@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    we have HAD body cams, and they have NOT been held accountable. They make things WORSE because if they catch something on camera later they can use it against you even if it had nothing to do with what was being recorded at the time.

      • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        “anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law”

        Is not “anything you say may or may not be used to help prove your innocence”

        they tell you flat out they’re out to get you even if they know they’re wrong

        • jasory
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Proving innocence is analogous to proving a negative, far harder than proving guilt (a positive) which is why it is not the legal standard.

          “Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law”

          This is literally Hollywood fiction. The Miranda warning has never had “and will”. It does not require any verbal claim that any statements made will be submitted as evidence.

      • jasory
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because the user lied. Sure it’s theoretically possible for it to happen, but if a DA charges you with it and a jury convicts you, then you have to ask yourself what kind of mental illnesses are prevalent in your community?