• FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 days ago

    Everyone who abuses their power suffers economic repercussions at a minimum, militaristic repurcussions via the funding and arming of their opponents in some cases, but the precedent here being set is China asking “if the world won’t defend you, why should you defend the world?” It’s a dangerous warmongering idea that unfortunately might be taking root.

    • Tja
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      22 days ago

      The US hasn’t really suffered any serious consequences, yet. Similar to China. Russia didn’t until Ukraine, before that they messed in Chechnya, Georgia, etc with impunity. I don’t see anyone coming to the aid of Tibet or the uyghurs either, China is pretty scot free.

        • Tja
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          21 days ago

          Very very minor. Some strongly worded letters and symbolic sanctions. They could have kept crimea and most of the donbas and in a decade things would have gone back to normal.

      • Avicenna
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        21 days ago

        and Ukraine only because it borders Europe

        • Tja
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 days ago

          Some would argue 'is in Europe "even.