Mathematician warns NSA may be weakening next-gen encryption::Quantum computers may soon be able to crack encryption methods in use today, so plans are already under way to replace them with new, secure algorithms. Now it seems the US National Security Agency may be undermining that process

  • Molecular0079@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    1 year ago

    If this is true, NSA might be shooting themselves in the foot when they inevitably have to deal with Russia and China.

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just a guess, but I think they’re less concerned about the giant country’s surveillance of us, and more concerned about not being able to surveil the little terrorist cells.

    • Zeth0s@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      They probably consider that they overall lose more with strong cryptography, than the risk of other countries intercepting US communications. They must have other solutions in place to protect confident information. But they likely struggle with encryption being so widely used by anyone. Even granmas can now cover their communications without much effort

      • thesmokingman
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is still somehow the predominant attitude. It has also been the traditional attitude that led to things like RSA and PGP getting attacked by the Us government.

    • Lmaydev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Theres a theory that China are sucking up as much encrypted data as they can so that when computers are powerful enough then they can easily crack it.

      Encryption is based on it being too time consuming / complex to crack but older methods are continuously becoming weak.

      It’s all an illusion really.