She was on the free plan.
Of course God, the figurative SW architect and management, also included a fatal flaw in the system as part of the design and gets pissed when things go to shit per implementation of said design.
Dick.
How come God gets a robe and all we get are these itchy leaves?!
The Christian god, no less. The one that’s supposed to be forgiving and understanding and no fucky neighbor’s daddy before him or something
That’s only the new testament god. The old testament god would do things like turn you into a pillar of salt because you glanced back at the city you were fleeing when he told you not to. He probably took anger management courses off-screen during the time skip or something.
That’s only the new testament god. The old testament god would do […]
Yeah and that’s the same god that’s also perfect and unchanging right?
Pillar of salt was kind of low point tbh. He shoulda listened…
Don’t forget when he destroyed a man’s life for a goof, and a gaff. A man, God himself describes as blameless and upright in all manners - a perfect representation of a good person. >!Book of Job!<
I like the snake back there on the tree grinning like Ernest Saves Paradise
So, on the paid plans, are there actually fewer bullshit answers? So the LLM checks its answer first by default?
afaik the difference is that the free model is gpt-5-mini instead of the full one, and they stole less data for training that
The highest tier llms are def superior, you can use try them free at least once a day for a response, they use code more and more to accomplish their goals and actually show their work, widgets too, lots of suprisingly decent stuff for education, like a virtual textbook, I wouldnt pay for it rnow, but in a few years it might actually be decent and accurate 99% of the time when it comes to college level assignments while teaching you how to do them and showing the work. The widgets are kinda wild, they feel like professional, like theyd be built into an online textbook, actually helpful, using particles and sht, kinda like old flash games but for education
You seem to have lost most of your punctuation. Here - I have some spares:
. . . . . . . - - - - - ; ; ; ; : : : :( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ! ! ! ! ? ? ? ?
English is my 2nd language is a great excuse when I don’t feel like talking correctly. Then it suddenly becomes impressive to communicate.
I will never bother to use correct grammer for a comment section, I got my degree and my remote job involves checking and using correct grammar all day. I am not doing that elsewhere.
I’m honestly impressed by the number of ways people have turned a relatively cool & fun word in to something more and more annoying with each variation.
Of course, that’s just me vibesnaping. 👺
I’m vibecommenting rn
Really phoning it in
Vibecancer diagnosis, most unfortunate. Second only to ligma.
Ligma is nothing compared to Dragma
Whats dragma?
Dragma balls on your face ooooh lmaogotem
Bear with me while I vibevomit
If only an AI had come up with this.
I’m picturing Google employees furiously typing out answers to prompts as an AI stand-in
It’ll never stop being funny to me that Adam and Eve were in paradise where there was no such thing as shame yet they still wore big leaves on their privates because… Reasons.
That is, of course, funny only if these bronze age fairy tales were true to begin with, it’s all badly written fiction and I would be so happy of people just could get over themselves and stop believing in shit that 5 year olds already know to be false.
I also just noticed the irony in covering their nakedness being a part of “original sin” but churches today lead the puritanical positions against general nudity and sexuality.
Also funny in that bad fiction way that it was about disobeying some arbitrary rule and it’s never explained or even really acknowledged that humans shouldn’t have knowledge. Like it’s such an obvious form of control, right in the first story, not to mention how many of the ten commandments were about establishing a hierarchy rather than any kind of morality.
Like it’s accepted history that Constantine was looking for a way to unite the far corners of Rome, since it was hard to motivate people to join legions to fight for people half a world away after they ran out of easy land to promise. So he just happened to find the “true religion” that he needed, that had a bible that was taken literally until it was so obviously incompatible with reality that it was now metaphors that could still describe reality if you back up and squint and assume dumb shit like “many cultures talk about floods, therefore they must be talking about noah’s flood!”
Which is kinda like saying, “Wait, people in your culture die, too? That’s proof that we were all kicked out of paradise and lost our immortality!”
Also ignoring how the old testament god acts more like an immature dictator throwing tantrums than a god, yet there’s plenty of stories of people defying that god despite these apparent displays of miraculous power.
As I recall, they were actually naked and didn’t feel the need to cover themselves until after eating from the “tree of knowledge of good and evil”.
Thanks to that stupid fucking story and all the others, many cultures heavily influenced by Christian mythology feel the need to add those leaves because they can’t handle nudity.
This.
But also https://teachdiary.com/where-fig-leaves-first-came-into-fashion/
In ancient cultures, fig trees symbolized fertility, prosperity, and knowledge—making them a fitting choice for a moment involving the transition from innocence to awareness.
I mean, they pretty clearly did not wear anything or have shame until they sinned. Then they were ashamed of their nakedness and tried to cover themselves with leaves. When God came to them he killed an animal and clothed them with animal skin.
They also did not have ChatGTP back then either.
Big, if true.
Grok, is this real?
(I hate myself now)
But how did they think back then? How did they know which fruit to eat?
Mick Huckabee is very cross with you.
“Would you like me to come up with strategies to eat the fruit without anyone noticing? Just say so and I’ll make you the best plan to eat the forbidden fruit without anyone noticing.”
I don’t get it. Is she asking the AI if she could do that after the fact?
When you AI is wrong and you tell question it, it will admit fault like in the comic.
If you initially ask it a question, it usually just answers it.
I think it’s the feedback after the so common failure of taking the machine output at face value.
