erik111189@lemmy.world to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 1 year agoWhat are some companies that deserve to be boycotted to death?message-squaremessage-square333fedilinkarrow-up1379arrow-down129file-text
arrow-up1350arrow-down1message-squareWhat are some companies that deserve to be boycotted to death?erik111189@lemmy.world to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square333fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareCall me Lenny/Leni@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up49arrow-down4·1 year agoAutism Speaks. It has a pro-eugenics mindset, so you’d think everyone would be boycotting it, right? Nope, in fact it’s partnered with the Jim Henson company.
minus-squareThunderWhiskers@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up11·1 year agoCan you elaborate on the “pro-eugenics mindset” at all?
minus-squaregivesomefucks@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up34arrow-down1·edit-28 months agoRemoved by mod
minus-squarehungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down3·1 year ago thought the label was worse than the disease Autism is not a disease.
minus-squaregivesomefucks@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15arrow-down1·edit-28 months agoRemoved by mod
minus-squareintensely_human@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·1 year agoI got my local grocery store to stop partnering with them for donations.
minus-squareintensely_human@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·1 year agoThe first problematic thing it does is have the name Autism Speaks while not in any way providing a voice to autistic people.
minus-squareconciselyverbose@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down2·1 year agoI’m guessing they encourage screening for genetic markers of autism.
minus-squareIdealShrew@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down1·1 year agohow is this different from screening for any other illness?
minus-squareThunderWhiskers@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 year agoThat was my confusion as well. Genetic screening isn’t worthy of condemnation but “pro-eugenics” has a pretty broad spectrum.
minus-squareintensely_human@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down3·1 year agoIt’s more like screening for left handedness than it is like screening for cerebral palsy.
minus-squareBye@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoAutistic people, as they define it, are not just differently abled. They started the foundation where that word didn’t include people with mild cases. If you could screen out non verbal, low functioning autism, that would be a good thing, just like screening out downs and whatnot.
Autism Speaks. It has a pro-eugenics mindset, so you’d think everyone would be boycotting it, right? Nope, in fact it’s partnered with the Jim Henson company.
Can you elaborate on the “pro-eugenics mindset” at all?
Removed by mod
Autism is not a disease.
Removed by mod
I got my local grocery store to stop partnering with them for donations.
The first problematic thing it does is have the name Autism Speaks while not in any way providing a voice to autistic people.
I’m guessing they encourage screening for genetic markers of autism.
how is this different from screening for any other illness?
That was my confusion as well. Genetic screening isn’t worthy of condemnation but “pro-eugenics” has a pretty broad spectrum.
It’s more like screening for left handedness than it is like screening for cerebral palsy.
Autistic people, as they define it, are not just differently abled. They started the foundation where that word didn’t include people with mild cases.
If you could screen out non verbal, low functioning autism, that would be a good thing, just like screening out downs and whatnot.