• deweydecibel
      link
      fedilink
      English
      388 months ago

      That only solves half the issue. The other half is everything released after the change.

      • @[email protected]
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        24
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        They just need a paid account and they can keep appending to it.

        "Open"subtitles has like a 1k dowload/day limit, which should cover most media.

        • deweydecibel
          link
          fedilink
          English
          18 months ago

          Hope you’re right, but there’s a lot of stuff released in a day, and you have to consider all the other languages. They’ll need a couple at least.

  • Count Regal Inkwell
    link
    fedilink
    English
    252
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Finally: ClosedSubtitles

    EDIT: Also, MAN, a lot of straight up bootlicking in this thread. What the fuck kind of pirates are you? lmao

  • @[email protected]
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1768 months ago

    Jesus, reading comprehension is hard to come by eh? How have so many people struggled to actually read this?

    They aren’t requiring payment, nor are they requiring you to sign in or create an account.

    They are transitioning from an old API to a new one. The new API (and the site itself) is ad supported and rate limited; 5 downloads per day unauthenticated, double that for a free account, or ‘VIP’ accounts have higher limits and no ads.

    It’s not authenticated access only, nor is it paid access only.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      33
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      “It’s not paid, you can pay by watching ads and get a laughable amount of downloads per day for free!”

      Sometimes you have to cycle through many subtitles to find the right one. They don’t even produce them.

      In the era of VPN, many users share the same IP too. You can reach the limit before downloading anything.

      • @[email protected]
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        68 months ago

        In the era of VPN, many users share the same IP too. You can reach the limit before downloading anything.

        Then create a free account and it’s no longer limited by ip and you get double the anonymous limit.

      • @[email protected]
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -18 months ago

        How many subs do you download at a time??
        Juat spread it out or cough up some cash … >_>

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I’ve already explained the use-case. Spare me of your “witty” remarks with no value added.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -34
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      It doesn’t say any of that information about non-VIP accounts, go read it yourself, and the information you quoted about anonymous accounts is also wrong.

      edit: I won’t be receiving any replies from this commenter. If anyone wants to say I’m wrong, feel free to provide a screenshot from the blogpost proving it.

      • @[email protected]
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        288 months ago

        Since you deleted the comment I replied to:

        There’s six big ass bold numbered paragraphs detailing the differences between the ‘VIP’ (paid) users and ‘non-VIP’ (free) users.

        There’s also a link to the REST API docs where the first thing it details is exactly how authentication is handled. Specifically: an application looking to interface with opensubtitles will have an api key embedded by its developer and without logging in further will have 5 free downloads/day, that can then be expanded by the end user logging in with their (free or VIP) account.

        That documentation lists anonymous accounts (not signed in as a specific user) as rated limited to 5/day. That doubles to 10 for signed in (but still free) users and grows further with VIP.

        • db0OPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          28 months ago

          You realize the developer key is still authentication, hmmm?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            58 months ago

            Not really, no. Those keys are more or less equivalent to a browser’s user agent, difference is you don’t choose your own but get them from OpenSubtitles. Motivation probably ranges from “that makes it easy to reject random crawlers” to “we’d like to know the people writing software against our API, or at least have a way to contact them”.

            You’ll also be able to find examples of such keys in repositories in the future in case you don’t want to request one of your own but frankly speaking that’s a dick move.

          • @[email protected]
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            38 months ago

            To an extent, but it’s only really relevant to developers. End users don’t see or interact with this at all and aren’t required to provide further info.

            For 99% of people, this change makes very little, if any, difference. The way it’s been worded makes it seem like no one gets to use opensubtitles anymore unless they start shelling out cash.

            • db0OPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              18 months ago

              I was very careful to not say it needs payment

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        The OP doesn’t, but the REST API Docs say:

        Your consumer can query the API on its own, and download 5 subtitles per IP’s per 24 hours, but a user must be authenticated to download more. Users will then be able to download as many subtitles as their ranks allows, from 10 as simple signed up user, to 1000 for VIP user.

        https://opensubtitles.stoplight.io/docs/opensubtitles-api/e3750fd63a100-getting-started

        Though that’s not fully ‘unauthenticated’, as the above is discussing the use of a developer API key. Though that would be built into whatever app is being used.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Except the screencap I provided shows different information, and as you say it’s not in the OP, so there’s still no reason for that guy being a jackass about others being confused about the situation.

    • lemmyvore
      link
      fedilink
      English
      738 months ago

      Title is a bit misleading. Starting with 2024 the site will be moving to a new API. The payment is too be able to continue to use the old API a while longer (for software that can’t be changed yet).

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        138 months ago

        Additionally, it’s just a limit on how much you can download. You can still get 10 subtitles a day for free.

        Your consumer can query the API on its own, and download 5 subtitles per IP’s per 24 hours, but a user must be authenticated to download more. Users will then be able to download as many subtitles as their ranks allows, from 10 as simple signed up user, to 1000 for VIP user.

  • Metal Zealot
    link
    fedilink
    English
    106
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    How… how could you possibly start trying to profit off of a major resource for accessibility to movies. That’s scummier than scummy. Fuck you OpenSubtitles, you’re the fucking Elon Musk and Steve Huffman of deaf people everywhere. Get absolutely fucked.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      568 months ago

      I swear I read a thread here (on lemmy) recently that one of these subtitle sites was embedding ads in the subtitles. Now that takes things even further than scummier in my opinion, especially since subtitles are for availability.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        498 months ago

        I mean I’ve been a pirate for a WHILE and you generally do see ads on opensubtitles subs. Generally it’s opensubtitles saying you can advertise with them, or credits for subtitles that stay on the screen for way too long, but this has been a thing forever now, I don’t recall a time when this wasn’t done.

        I don’t think I can take the moral high ground on it seeing as…well, I am a pirate lol. We out here doing our best to stay afloat, opensubtitles included.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          68 months ago

          So frustrating when a subtitle ad pops up spoiling that a movie is ending.

          Something dramatic happening on screen and then “you can advertise on opensubtitles” appears on the bottom letting you know that there is 10 seconds left and spoiling any tension or drama in the scene.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          48 months ago

          TBH it’s just simple text files, you can open any .srt with Notepad and edit it to your liking. I always remove those dumb ads at the beginning and the end.

      • Petri
        link
        fedilink
        English
        28 months ago

        Correct. They now embed ads directly into the subtitles. There is a python program to strip those ads out, but doesn’t work with Plex directly. It can be setup with bazarr, but that requires sonarr and or radar…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -528 months ago

      Their website is still free and every legal way to watch movies already includes subtitles.

      • Metal Zealot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        688 months ago

        Oh, no harm done then, lets keep allowing every online resource to implement shitty money grabbing tactics

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -248 months ago

          It sucks, sure. But it’s been free for a really long time, and it costs money to run a service.

          You can’t really expect that a service will serve an increasing amount of people free stuff forever.

          At least making people visit the site will encourage them to upload and help keep the service up.

          Btw, it’s not expensive and if you think it is. Just use some other service.

          • Metal Zealot
            link
            fedilink
            English
            518 months ago

            THEN ASK PEOPLE TO DONATE, how tone-deaf can you be about your own community?? What the fuck do they think Wikipedia is doing?
            I’ve found pirates & FOSS enthusiasts are FAR more likely to donate into something they use regularly and appreciate, this is a blatant slap in the face to those people.

          • Metal Zealot
            link
            fedilink
            English
            23
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            This unfortunately helps sets a precedent for what the internet is going to look like in the future. Even the most basic things will be behind a paywall.
            You cant even read a fucking news article from New York Times, who made 173.91 million dollars last year

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              28 months ago

              A lot of things are already like that. IIUC this is restrictions on the API not the subs themselves. If you’d like you can still go to the site to download specific subs. What you can’t do is use bazarr to bulk download subs. Personally I bought vip since I found the free tier API limit pretty bad and I didn’t think the price was so bad for what you get back. Feel free to disagree tho. Before I automated my setup I was just manually searching for subs for movies I wanted and that worked pretty well and will continue to do so if you’d prefer that.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -188 months ago

              News has never historically been free, only recently through the web and founded by ads.

              • Kuori [she/her]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                128 months ago

                nothing should ever be better than it was in the past. everything should continue to suck forever.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -118 months ago

                  How much money do you think they would have made if they gave away all their content for free.

                  News is pretty expensive.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                28 months ago

                True, but just look at how much better it has gotten in the last couple decades. Putting the news behind the paywall runs the risk of ending the battle for impressions and might force nuance into well researched stories.

          • kbal
            link
            fedilink
            78 months ago

            But it’s been free for a really long time

            Of course it has. You need to offer the world a useful service for some length of time before you have dominated the market to such an extent that you can cut the quality and jack up the prices without there being any meaningful competition to worry about.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -58 months ago

              You talk like they are owned by some huge corporation and this was their plan from the beginning.

              • kbal
                link
                fedilink
                3
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                So who exactly does own OpenSubtitles Group Limited, and what are their motivations? If you’re claiming to know, I assume you must be some kind of insider? Because they don’t seem to be all that open about it. Otherwise we can only judge by their actions.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  08 months ago

                  I don’t know who they are but it’s quite evident that they at least we’re a very small group in the beginning.

                  I also haven’t seen any evidence that there is an evil corpo controlling them or something.

                  Occam’s razor

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          18 months ago

          It’s often more comprehensive than what opensubtitles have to offer. I often struggle to get tv episodes with subs in my native language, but all the streaming services obviously has it.

  • originalucifer
    link
    fedilink
    988 months ago

    ha, i love how their reasoning tried to not point out the obvious: money

    upgrade to vip for a better user experience! (cuz we made the other one shitty on purpose cuz money)

    im not faulting them for charging a price for a service, just dont blow smoke up my ass for why youre doin it.

    • db0OPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2488 months ago

      I’m actually faulting them for trying to make money off a crowdsourced service. They didn’t write the damn subtitles.

      • Kerrigor
        link
        fedilink
        1428 months ago

        Also, wrong fucking audience. The people using this are pirating… what do they think is going to happen when they put a paywall in front 😂

        • Metal Zealot
          link
          fedilink
          English
          308 months ago

          Textbook shooting yourself in the foot, I really don’t know what they were hoping to gain. You already had a long-lasting reputation in the online community, now you’re a fucking scab

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -18 months ago

            They weren’t gaining anything with the free service, now they might get a bit of money from it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -188 months ago

          The uploaders often get VIP for free and what will happen is probably just good for them. Leechers aren’t the greatest for torrents nor services.

          I pay for it, because it’s cheap and I might as well.

          • andrew
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            IDK, if I was contributing subtitles for an open provider free of charge who shared them free of charge, I’d be glad my subtitles were helping people who needed them. Now that labor has been turned into capital and that rug has been pulled with no back-dated compensation or provisions for free subtitles for hard of hearing or something. It’s a shitty move across the board for everyone but the owner.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -108 months ago

              The subs are still free for casual users the ones that need to pay are power users that download through the API.

              The API users won’t upload subs or anything, website users are more likely to do that.

              I doubt I will switch provider because they seem to be the best by far and I download 1-2 files per movie/series automatically via Bazarr.

              If anyone knows any non shit options please tell me.

              • Vaquedoso
                link
                fedilink
                English
                68 months ago

                I would hardly consider ‘power users’ the ones who download via the API. I used to download them via BSPlayer, where it will prompt you in a nice user friendly interface if you needed subtitles for whatever you were watching. Well, that used the old OpenSubtitles API, and now that it’s gone it’s not gonna work anymore

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        498 months ago

        …make money off a crowdsourced service. They didn’t write the damn subtitles.

        Ah the reddit formula

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          28
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          And ancestry dot com. That one still chaps my ass. My mom spent so much time in there adding in her work, and they just fucking locked it one day behind a paywall. Fuck these sites that just take the users hard work and then try and profit off it without announcing that from the get go.

          • db0OPM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            218 months ago

            Always assume that’s the ultimate goal with for-profit services.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              118 months ago

              I always assume that. My mom was getting up there in age, and just having a fun time entering in her work. She had no clue that would happen, until it did.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        18
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        This will just create new competition for them. I have been watching anime for several years and never once had to go through opensubtitles. Most releases now have the subtitles integrated so what is the value they bring to the whole thing?

        Edit: I just realized I’m replying the one an only db0, you are the best, cheers!

        • db0OPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          268 months ago

          Anime is a different culture. Most non-anime stuff doesn’t have them embedded (especially the old stuff) and it’s still useful for finding subtitles for other languages

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          08 months ago

          I use it primarily because the embedded subs are often in vubsub which fucking sucks and can’t be played probably on some devices, they also don’t scale probably.

  • Norgur
    link
    fedilink
    808 months ago

    See, I get when YouTube or some such are asking for some kind of payment, since transcoding and delivering all those large video files is expensive as fuck. Yet, Open subtitles delivers text. Fucking. Text. The rest is done for them for free by the users. No, folks. You ain’t getting any money.

  • Metal Zealot
    link
    fedilink
    English
    738 months ago

    My wife is deaf, and I take this VERY fucking personally. This is predatory to an already (unfortunately) overlooked demographic of movie lovers, I will absolutely rally against this bullshit.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      128 months ago

      I’m not deaf but I fucking love subtitles.

      There’s a lot of mumbly actors out there.

    • lazynooblet
      link
      fedilink
      English
      118 months ago

      My wife is deaf. So subtitles are a deal breaker for any media implementation I implement.

      That is why I pay for open subtitles. I get no ads, continued access after this change and I’m helping maintain a service we use daily.

      • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏
        link
        fedilink
        English
        238 months ago

        That is why I pay for open subtitles

        Lost me right here. Personally I’m not ever going to pay for a service where the work done by volunteer users, for free, is filling some random person’s pockets. An argument can’t even be made a la RedHat here - there’s literally no value being added to the volunteers’ work by OpenSubtitles…

        OpenSubtitles literally has pulled a shXtter here IMO

        • @thesmokingman
          link
          English
          148 months ago

          What about infrastructure costs? Are you comfortable making someone else pay for your access? What about the design and implementation of the API? Should all software be free?

          Please note that I’m not trying to support this decision at all. I personally feel like API access is similar to SSO for enterprise stuff (check out sso.tax). I also feel like there should be some level of compensation and even profit so people can focus on building stuff like this. It’s really hard to define what that is, especially without transparent costs, which I don’t believe OpenSubtitles shares? Also they use super predatory ads so I don’t think they have any high ground to even suggest what I’m talking about.

          • @[email protected]
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            13
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            They host incredibly tiny text files. We are talking in the single KB range. Even serving millions of these a day is minor load to current hosting environments.

            Most modern webpages load the equivalent of 1000s of subtitles to every user on every page load, including small sites like personal blogs.

            I would be surprised if their hosting costs were even in the $1000s/month instead of $100s.

            Thats the likely reason they don’t share the costs. It’s that cheap to run. Even asking for donations might be pushing it. Demanding payment? Bullshit.

        • lazynooblet
          link
          fedilink
          English
          48 months ago

          I’m paying for the fact it’s popular with submitters so has the most subs available (this could change with the recent announcement, we’ll see) and an API that allows automated download of subtitles including matching of the scene file that is being played, supported by Jellyfin/Plex.

          Is there another, free, as popular resource with an API? If so, please share.

        • Metal Zealot
          link
          fedilink
          English
          18 months ago

          He can put that subscription right up there with his Youtube Premium

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          18 months ago

          No work? They host, maintain and provide access to a massive catalogue of subtitles providing metadata needed for matching media to subs and up until recently we’re giving free access to everyone. Might I suggest if you care about your wife’s access to subtitled movies this much that maybe you should buy the 10 euro per year subscription for her to help keep the platform alive? Alternatively you can find a subtitles group that does all this for free and choose to solely download their subs (also I assume donating to them since you’re so appreciative of their work).

      • Metal Zealot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        148 months ago

        you know… most companies include subs in the DVD or file.
        For free.
        You’re paying for a service that should be the universal standard.

        • lazynooblet
          link
          fedilink
          English
          6
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          True, but some scene members strip the subs from the media, although it’s getting rarer these days.

          I also use Bazarr to fetch SDH subtitles which include subtitles for background sounds and the names of who is talking.

          I agree that ideally subtitles should be included on all, but we don’t live in a perfect world.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            18 months ago

            Does anyone know which scenes are best for subtitles. I hate watching a movie and there is a foreign language and I know there’s supposed to be text on the screen but I get nada. I have to use context clues.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          18 months ago

          They often do not include many languages, sure if you want English subtitles it’s likely they will be there. But good luck getting subtitles for movies and shows that didn’t have an official in the given country.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      48 months ago

      Accessibility features are already scarce and paywalling them seems to be a trend that’s going on, like how reddit closed it’s API so blind users couldn’t even use it anymore. The /r/blind subreddit needed non-blind mods because their native app doesn’t support accessibility.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -1
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Why do you take this personally? Just use opensubtitles.com instead of their old opensubtitles.org?

      They are only changing the old .org API, because they are moving on to their new website and REST API that they’ve been working on for a while. The new REST API is still free for 5-10 subtitle downloads a day.

      Or you can download directly on the website.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    538 months ago

    If you’re looking for an alternative, I’ve had luck with https://subscene.com/

    I don’t really know what the best or most popular website is because this one has never really led me astray. That said, I don’t need to use them too often, so your mileage may vary.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      58 months ago

      They all seem to have pretty much the same subs one may have more niche stuff than others but that’s about it

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      28 months ago

      Am I the only one for whom "open"subtitles.org hasn’t worked in years? I literally cannot find the download button, like in those okboomer memes. Never used the API. Switched to subscene.com and haven’t had problems since.

    • @[email protected]
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      68 months ago

      Making a burner account isnt that hard and hardly a shittification in my books.
      Just a measure to ensure the free api access is correctly monetized which is a valid reason for a service to me.

      Would you work for free for your workplace without a compensation beyond a $5 bill and a pat on the back at times because your boss felt generous?

      • LoafyLemon
        link
        fedilink
        348 months ago

        Opensubtitles does not create the subtitles, that’s done by the community, which is being monetised and sub authors get nothing out of it.

        • @[email protected]
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          38 months ago

          I agree, that that’s a bad part of it.

          But we come a bit full circle here:
          OpenSubs pays for the server and availability and service speed.
          I assume the speed they provide ain’t the cheapest server they could get their hands on.
          If the cost of a free/unauthenticated users and the server bill breaks even with the VIP payment (cant call it a donation imo) then they should have all the rights to limit free users.

          Now if they actively lock features, then I have no feelings for them.

          • LoafyLemon
            link
            fedilink
            118 months ago

            Every service that disabled or limited the API has seen an increase in running costs, because people turn to scraping, which costs them more resources overall, and cannot be controlled by the site owners as easily.

            Let’s be honest, though, hosting text files with a search bar isn’t that much expensive to justify a response like this.

            It’s fine if they want to earn money, but then they should be upfront about it, and not making up stories about fluke running costs. I’d rather see a donation button.

            • @[email protected]
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              English
              18 months ago

              Totally valid and agree with your stance.

              But I feel like business decision in these times are rarely backed by good reasoning beyond quick cash and seldom long term thinking. So good job OpenSubs? Yay?

      • Venia Silente
        link
        fedilink
        English
        98 months ago

        Would you work for free for your workplace without a compensation beyond a $5 bill and a pat on the back at times because your boss felt generous?

        Misleading question. These kinds of communities are volunteer-fed, so you are basically asking me if I would work for free for a charity, which is the point. Things change notoriously when the boss then decides to monetize the entire thing for themself and not for you.

        • @[email protected]
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          18 months ago

          Well yes.
          I go with the 2nd view because IMO the first option barely applies anymore with the current business course and decision.

  • AMAKI
    link
    fedilink
    English
    478 months ago

    Subscene still exists, fortunately

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    37
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Subtitles are the easiest material to pirate :) I’m sure they don’t have a copyright either.

    • db0OPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      368 months ago

      Ye, but the problem is the ease of discovery

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        258 months ago

        Yeah probably all integrations are gonna break 😐

        I hate them for injecting embedded ads to subs anyways, so hopefully they ruins the platform more so an alternative can emerge.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          68 months ago

          I was OK with the ads. Just a message before the dialogue and a message after the movie dialogue was over.

          But paying for subs? Good luck.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      68 months ago

      Technically subs are copyrighted as they’re usually ripped from official sources. They’re selling copyrighted content

  • Metal Zealot
    link
    fedilink
    English
    358 months ago

    THE BALLS TO EVEN OFFER A “BLACK FRIDAY” DEAL, HOLY FUCK