• DarkGamer@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    The assumption that the existence or non-existence of Hamas has any effect on Israeli treatment of Palestinians is very naive.

    The blockade didn’t happen until Hamas was elected, the treatment of Gaza was obviously different before Hamas launched this attack. It is plainly obvious that Hamas had an effect on Israeli treatment of Palestinians, especially ones under their government.

      • DarkGamer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Right. Israel unilaterally left and disbanded all settlements in Gaza, then Gaza elected Hamas, then blockade.

        • TheDankHold@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          No you’re mixing it up. It transitioned immediately from occupation to siege and that’s part of what let Hamas get a plurality (not a majority) of the vote.

          Not to mention they set up settlements in the West Bank to this day.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.socialBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Uh… No. After the disengagement they immediately (three months before the voting) blockaded Gaza.