A subsidy-fueled boom helped build China into an electric-car giant but left weed-infested lots across the nation brimming with unwanted battery-powered vehicles.

  • onlinepersona
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t understand why they wouldn’t introduce a trade scheme for petrol car owners: swap your petrol pollution machine for a free EV!

    Also, why not sell these cars to be retrofitted with better batteries? Wouldn’t it be cheaper that building a whole new car? How is there no industry around this?

    • Sonori@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Becuse that requires the government own them, which requires that they finish working their way though bankruptcy court. Some already have, and the rest should follow sooner or later.

      • onlinepersona
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why would the government have to own them? Plus, it’s China. The government can persuade pretty much any national company to do their bidding. Sometimes they even persuade foreign companies to do their bidding *cough* Google Apple *cough*

        • Sonori@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Because it’s kind of hard to eminent domain the subject of an ongoing legal battle?

          • onlinepersona
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Really? The “communist” government that builds highways around the homes of people who don’t want to move, disappears business owners who don’t fall in line with the party mandate, and forces private companies to spy in their interest will find it “kind of hard” to nationalize resources of a private company?

            I’d like to remind you that China isn’t Europe or the US.

            • Sonori@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You will note that none of thouse things might involve repossessing things party members might own a stake in the same way that they would a failed company.