programming.dev
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
TheOneWithTheHair@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year ago

A good deal of IT work, too

lemmy.world

message-square
156
link
fedilink
1.27K

A good deal of IT work, too

lemmy.world

TheOneWithTheHair@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year ago
message-square
156
link
fedilink
  • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    You never did it, but still made money for claiming that you had?

    • ℛ𝒶𝓋ℯ𝓃@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d : contraction I + had, past participle active. Indicative of something having been done by the subject (in first person) in the past.

      "I did something I had never done (before / in the past).

      • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        “Before” is not implied.

        • TheTetrapod@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It is

          • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            1 year ago

            Nope.

            • 0xD@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Looks like everyone but you understood it correctly - maybe you should brush up on your language comprehension skills?

              • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                Maybe y’all could try having a sense of humor about things.

                • Empricorn@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Wrongly calling someone out while being too fragile to accept correction isn’t a “sense of humor”.

                  • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    6
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I’m not the one too fragile to accept correction.

        • ℛ𝒶𝓋ℯ𝓃@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Take an English class, I’m sure YouTube has a good video explaining it (basically there are different “degrees” of past tense, did / had done etc.)

          • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s still not implicit just because you inferred it.

            • TheFriendlyDickhead@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Well the word “before” doesn’t need to implicit. The “had” in I’d is more than enough past for the sentence to make sense

              • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                No, that simply indicated that they had not done the thing, i.e. at all.

                • psud@aussie.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  i.e. at all before that time

                  • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    No, they never said “before.”

            • ℛ𝒶𝓋ℯ𝓃@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              In the English language, an action I “had done” is before an action I “did.” It’s a grammatical case, not an inference.

              • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                He stated that he had not done it, not that he had not done it before.

                • saigot@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  No native English speaker would say it like that. You’d say “doing something I never even did”.

                  • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    No native English speaker would say it like you said.

    • Steve@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Assume they meant “previously”

      • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        If they meant it, they’d have written it.

    • BirdyBoogleBop@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Must be a government contract

      • xpinchx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I did do this for web dev for a government contract. I got brought on for mobile optimizations but ended up doing full UI/UX design and marketing copy with no experience. All through their shitty in house WYSIWYG. $60/hr for a full year lol.

      • shiroininja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nah, business.

    • aard@kyu.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      In IT contracting (at least the fields I’m around) it’s quite common that “being able to acquire new skills quickly” is one of the skills you get paid for, and the time needed for you to do that is accounted for in the project planning.

Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world

lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful

Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

…


2. No Illegal Content

Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

…


3. No Spam

Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

…


4. No Porn/Explicit

Content


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

…


5. No Enciting Harassment,

Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

…


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

…

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 4.02K users / day
  • 10.1K users / week
  • 15.7K users / month
  • 31.7K users / 6 months
  • 297 local subscribers
  • 31.5K subscribers
  • 15.5K Posts
  • 323K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Aer@lemmy.world
  • Striker@lemmy.world
  • WiildFiire@lemmy.world
  • Decoy321@lemmy.world
  • Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
  • YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world
  • The Picard Maneuver@startrek.website
  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
  • The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.11
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org