• onion@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The problem isn’t math, it’s the people that suck at at it who write ambigous terms like this, and all the people in the comments who weren’t educated properly on what conventions are.

    • Swallowtail@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, you could easily make this more straightforward by putting parentheses around 8÷2. It’s like saying literature sucks because Finnegans Wake is incomprehensible.

      • 💡𝚂𝗆𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗆𝖺𝗇 𝙰𝗉𝗉𝗌📱
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        you could easily make this more straightforward by putting parentheses around 8÷2

        But that would be a different expression with a different answer (16 rather than 1). This is the mistake made by the programmer of the e-calc - treats it as though there’s extra brackets there when there isn’t.

    • loops@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Huge shout out to the jaded AF high school math teachers that don’t give a fuck any more!

      • 💡𝚂𝗆𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗆𝖺𝗇 𝙰𝗉𝗉𝗌📱
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        They do care. The issue is everyone argues about it without even asking Maths teachers about it to being with! I guarantee (I’ve seen it myself) literally every blog you read which says this is “ambiguous”, without exception they never mention Maths textbooks or Maths teachers (because then they wouldn’t be able to bombastically declare “This is ambiguous!”).