• GnastyGnuts [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        1 year ago

        The personal property / private property distinction really confuses some people for some reason. Granted, there are also a lot of people who are just assholes and act like clarifying the usage of the terms is just you trying to be “evasive” (I’ve gotten that response).

        • Hohsia [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah it’s kinda silly but I get it

          I’ve tried to explain it to some people and their takeaways are incredible in a baffling way

        • CaliforniaSpectre [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think it’s really simple to just say private capital vs. personal property. Gets across the most important issue that we mean by private property and it doesn’t come with so much rhetorical baggage.

  • supafuzz [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    ·
    1 year ago

    I want people to own nothing because everything should be held in common for the public good

    You want people to own nothing so that you can charge rent forever

    We are not the same. Now face the wall

    • ImmortanStalin@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      1 year ago

      We want to collectively own and manage the means of production to our benefit as a whole. Personal property is just that, and it’s yours. I like the vibe of this comment, anyhow. Lol

  • Adkml [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best argument for piracy.

    I’d even say you can get to a pretty strong argument that it’s morally justifiable.

    Why is it any better for them to take something from you that you’ve already paid for then for you to take something you didn’t pay for.

    • 420blazeit69 [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why is it any better for them to take something from you that you’ve already paid for then for you to take something you didn’t pay for.

      chefs-kiss

    • barrbaric [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why is it any better for them to take something from you that you’ve already paid for then for you to take something you didn’t pay for.

      Well you see they’re a giant corporation so they have rights and you don’t! porky-happy

    • HornyOnMain@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      The best argument is that I don’t give a shit whether it’s morally justifiable or not, i’ll never get in trouble with the law for it, i like getting free stuff and the only victims are corporations and fuck them

      • Adkml [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh fully agree nobody should have to justify stealing from corporations it’s just hilarious that even the biggest bootlicking civility fetishist would have a hard time scolding somebody for this when the corporations are doing something worse by any objective observation.

  • BodyBySisyphus [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    1 year ago

    Daily reminder that staring at a blank wall while your internal monologue slowly descends into gibbering madness remains free!*

    *Blank wall sold separately

    • Adkml [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also it better be a privately owned wall or else a cops gonna harass you for loitering.

      Cant be just standing around in public not spending money

  • Frogmanfromlake [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    1 year ago

    More people should learn computer literacy and how to pirate. The majority mostly buy old media over pirating because they don’t have the skills to pirate. Bootlegs are huge in my country because of this.

  • jwt
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 year ago

    “We sincerely thank you for your continued support”

    I know it’s not the main thing to take issue with. But the insincerity of those ‘sincere thanks’ pisses me off to no end. Like they magically found a way to claim we support them by saying so. Don’t piss on my leg and tell me it’s raining, at least be upfront about fucking me over.

    • tslnox@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      I always fume with anger when some website captions their cookie banner “We care about your privacy”. No you fucking don’t and the dialog where you have to manually uncheck 10+ individual cookie types and also their fucking"legitimate interest" (no, there isn’t any legitimate interest about my data).

      And also when some company whose only purpose is to make money sends me e-mails beginning with "Hello, ". We aren’t friends, we are business partners. If I’ll write you about let’s say a RMA, I won’t address you “David” either. Keep it professional, will ya, ya smeee-heeee.

    • Quexotic [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m interested to see where the courts land on the enforcibility of the terms and conditions stipulated at time of purchase. Should be interesting. For example, the purchase of the media is no doubt framed as a type of ownership given that you “buy” the item but no doubt it stipulated that your usage of purchased content is contingent upon a vast array of terms and conditions agreed to at time of purchase.

  • Evilsandwichman [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    I still remember when I read the terms and conditions for my ps3 and discovered that I’m only renting it rather than own it; I don’t own emulators either but at least those are free

  • Dalek [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Your device> HDMI cable> £10 HDCP bypass box >HDMI cable> your recording/capture device. You’ve paid for it, you might as well make a copy. You will have to watch it through though to copy.

    • Kynuck97 [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I fucking hope there’s a lawsuit. They’re probably leaning on some understanding that by agreeing to their ToS, you agree that you don’t own any of your content. But i feel like that also betrays the common person’s understanding of how digital content works, or at least how it should work. Basically anything you cant download DRM-free and back up yourself is subject to disappear at any time.