• callouscomic@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Critics for movies tend to shit on everything I like. Critics for video games tend to overrate games highly way too much.

    • Plopp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t know about game critics, but movie critics have (usually) studied film on an academic level, and watched a whole fuck ton of movies for the purpose of breaking them down and analyzing them. They’re not watching and/or thinking about movies like most people. Of course they will judge them differently.

      • phx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah. I basically focusing on nitpicky professional details and missing the “is this movie entertaining/fun” part.

        • JackbyDev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          You can differentiate between if a film is “objectively” good and subjectively enjoyable to yourself.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      The problem is critics are people who always value the new and interesting, and good acting. Because they watch a lot of movies, day in day out.

      Sometimes normal viewers just want something dumb that’s exactly what they expect.

      For me, it’s not Bruce that’s great in Die Hard. It’s Rickman. Die Hard 3 does better on the protagonist side because of the chemistry between Jackson and Willis, but again it’s the classically trained theatre actor doing a lot of the heavy lifting, single-handedly stopping it from turning into an episode of Blue’s Clues.