• xkforce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    106
    ·
    1 year ago

    The article (and what I can access of the paper it is based on) doesn’t really give any details as to what this class is, how it works etc. All the interesting parts about this aren’t mentioned.

    • krellor@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      59
      ·
      1 year ago

      It sounds like they trained a classification model using 39,000 molecules with known reactivity to MRSA. The molecules are vectorized text representations of the structures. Once trained, they can run arbitrary molecules through the model and see which ones are predicted to have antibiotic properties, or at least MRSA reactivity.

      They likely fed in molecules from families of structures that seem likely to contain an antibiotic but are too numerous to manually test them all. They get a prediction of which ones are likely to have the properties they want, and then start the slow process of creating and testing the molecules in the lab.

      • xkforce@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        1 year ago

        I get what they did (its been something a lot of groups have been wanting to do for years) but I am curious what molecule specifically they found that worked especially well. i.e What does this thing look like? What is the new antibiotic’s mechanism of action? None of those latter details are discussed. Its something we can only guess at.

        • krellor@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          1 year ago

          It sounds like they are moving forward with clinical testing in partnership with a bio company, so I’m sure they withheld the information anticipating a patent. The results of this paper was the validation of the explainable AI model which identified candidate classes of compounds.

          • TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            1 year ago

            Wow I love science. I love that someone owns the exclusive rights to sell new drugs at whatever price they want

            • scarabic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              This is why we need single payer healthcare. Let them charge whatever they want, but if there is only one buyer, that buyer can also pay whatever they want.

            • Aleric@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              That’s not science, that’s capitalism. Don’t forget that Dr. Jonas Salk refused to patent the polio vaccine, which is estimated to have a total value of over seven billion US dollars. Dr. Salk has always been a hero of mine.

              Shit bag lawyers from the National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis later tried to see if they could patent it for themselves and luckily couldn’t. That’s capitalism for you. Fuck these guys.

    • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      But it’s going to be. Until we do something to stop them, it’s absolutely going to be that way. There’s no serious view of human history that will tell you anything different.

      We can’t just sit here and marvel at technology without acknowledging who controls it, who uses it, and what they’re going to use it for. Without people, AI is just a bunch of code sitting there waiting for input.

      • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You’re right, but We’ll get what we deserve when it comes to that.

        The one thing the greedy tech bastardizers have never been able to do is shut down, not for lack of trying, the benevolent open source and human knowledge belongs to the world movements. The seven seas are still free and the most motivated thinkers are still the open source ones, matey.

        They have nothing that isn’t already being extrapolated and tinkered with on private servers. If they use the soon to come AGI to make the peasant’s lives even more bleak, they might not like the damage in kind that can be done with some militant engineer’s homebrew anti-cap AGI. What could that do? Engineer a plague? Mass delete banking records? Who knows but it’s increasingly likely we’ll find out!

        If wealthy “winner” humans continue to insist on making most humans live’s increasingly desperate, solely because they are never getting richer fast enough and without regard to the concept of Mutually assured destruction, then our species will have to experience the inevitable consequences of that choice. They have the capital, so its on them.

        • lad
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          We’ll get what we deserve when it comes to that.

          What’s even worse, a lot of people are going to get what just a handful deserve

    • money_loo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s just a movie, relax.

      Staphylococcus kills thousands of people every year, this is a good thing.

      We have PLENTY of negative places you could go here on Lemmy that really really hate all things futurism and technology, please try to save your dooomerism for those places, we just literally don’t have many positive spaces left and it’s so frustrating to come from the good news of the article only to see silly comments like yours that make it seem like we are all going to die because AI found a way to help us.

      • thefartographer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sorry, you seem to have lost the thread. We’re talking about scary things that happen movies, not current daily real-world issues which could really use our focus but we’re to involved in the media.

        Focus on the media, join our ignorant dance.

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          There is a massively conservative movement lurking in the left, which opposes any new advances and wants people to return to subsistence farming and shit. Same kind of people that argue against having kids to gut the population worldwide

          Those people aren’t even worth arguing with. They’re not the people that will show up to do any work to accomplish policy objectives. They aren’t serious, their objections will never be listened to, and they don’t actually want to make anything better.

          It’s just tradwife-homesteader fantasizing, just with a different economic view and less (but not 0) racism.

    • EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe things will work out for the better. Maybe they take over. Worst case scenario I blow my fucking brains out so i don’t have to live though the apocalypse.

      I’ll roll those dice.

      • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Same!

        Either way, It’s main event time and we’re both fortunate enough to have tickets! I’ll even stay for the apocalypse and see how I do, to a point.

      • Dienervent@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I look at it as the AI we build is humanity’s child. It will outgrow us. And we will age out and die.

        On a cosmic scale, an AI can operate in ways humans never could.

        Even if you use the augmented humans path, eventually, all the human will be augmented out of existence until only the AI is left.

      • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        In this case I’m glad. We are close to achieving the technology to let technology self-iterate and propagate.

        The direction our species chooses to apply this technology will be a reflection and measure of who we are with commensurate rewards and/or consequences.

        Will some voices of sanity let us harness the power of this atom to enlighten the world? Or will we follow tradition and use our newfound power to make big boomie boom rival tribe over there, yet again?

  • KISSmyOS@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Quick! Produce tons of it and inject them into factory-farm livestock, like we did with all other antibiotics.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      My dad was allergic to practically every antibiotic. He only developed the allergy in his senior years. It was a big problem for him. Even if the antibiotic seemed to be working okay, he had to take a lot of Benadryl just in case and keep an epi pen around.

      • Smoogs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s very common as you hit a second puberty and you’re body is suddenly like ‘nah’.

        It’s like a warranty is up or something.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Thankfully, my mother doesn’t seem to have this problem. She’s 81, so if she hasn’t developed it yet, I don’t think she’s going to. Really sucked for my dad though.

  • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Does this AI use the same process for piecing together things as LLMs do for art and writing? Is this a drug we have known about but not yet applied as an antibiotic or a whole new compound?

    • krellor@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      It doesn’t sound like it but they don’t have enough detail in the article to say.

      It sounds likey they are using a classification model that takes a vectorized text representation of molecules and classifies or scores them by their expected properties/reactivity. They took 39,000 molecules with known reactivity to MRSA to train the model, I assume to classify the structures. Once trained they can feed in arbitrary molecules into the trained model and see which ones are predicted to have antibiotic properties, which they can verify with bench work.

      They likely fed in molecules from classes of likely candidate structures, and the model helped focus and direct the wet work.

      I’m not up on the latest, but years ago I helped a similar project using FPGAs running statistical models to direct lab work.

      • Jerkface@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’d be interested to know why FPGAs were selected for this application. I’m not especially familiar with their use cases.

        • krellor@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          This was years ago before GPU processing really took off, and we wanted the performance, but also, wanted to see if we could develop an affordable discrete lab device that could be placed in labs to aid in computationally directed bench work. So effectively, testing the efficacy of the models and designing ASICs to perform lab tests.

        • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          With a CPU or even a GPU, there is a bunch of inefficiencies for every task as they’re designed to be able to do pretty much anything - your H265 media decoder isn’t going to be doing much when you’re keeping a running sum of the number of a certain type of bond in a list of chemicals

          With ASICs and a lesser extent FPGAs, you can make it so every single transistor is being used at every moment which makes them wildly efficient for doing a single repetitive task, such as running statistical analysis on a huge dataset. This is because rather than being limited by the multiprocessing ability of the CPU or GPU, you can design the “program” to run with as much multiprocessing ability as is possible based on the program, meaning if you stream one input per clock cycle, after a delay you will get one input per clock cycle out, including your update function so long as it’s simple enough (eg moving average, running sum or even just writing to memory)

          This is one specific application of FPGAs (static streaming) but it’s the one that’s relevant here

          • Jerkface@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            So it sounds like we’re designing the instruction pipeline for maximum parallelism for our task. I was surprised to learn that the first commercial FPGAs were available as early as the '80s. I can see how this would have been an extremely effective option before CUDA became available.

    • Willy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      llms have progressed beyond cut and paste way more than a year ago. they have shown understanding of what items are and how they behave and interact. I know it’s popular here to call it a parrot or whatever but most people don’t have access to the high level stuff and most seem afraid/snobby/parroting things themselves.

    • agissilver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Virtual screening libraries are usually some form of expanded chemical space meaning they contain real and previously unknown compounds. The article says the 12 million compounds screened virtually were commercially available, but I couldn’t see enough of the nature paper to verify. It could be that the virtual screening set was acquired from a private company, but that doesn’t necessarily mean all the compounds are known.

    • DarkroomDoc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is a simplified to the point of absurdity comment. Microbiome is important, but is absolutely not enough to prevent antibiotic resistance.

          • MaximilianKohler@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            All that and yet your statement contradicts the plethora of citations that were provided, without providing any support yourself.

            • DarkroomDoc@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              If you spent more than 3 seconds reading what you post, you’d realize that fecal transplant only affects the gut microbiome, not body-wide resistance. Fecal transplant, obviously, does nothing to combat pneumonia, skin infections, abscesses, or literally anywhere other than the gut. As the vast majority of fatal or life threatening infections are not isolated to the gut, your argument fails. But I need not argue against citations, as the provided papers don’t even argue your point.

    • NAK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Bacterial infections can kill people.

      Don’t be stupid

        • NAK@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If the choice between giving someone life saving antibiotics or disrupting their gut microbiom until they eat some yogurt, that’s an easy choice.

          False equivalency is what you’re doing, btw

          • MaximilianKohler@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            What you just said is harmful misinformation and 100% demonstrates that you didn’t read a damn thing that you’re responding to and acting like you’re an expert on.

            • NAK@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              It isn’t, and a random website isn’t a source

              If you have an article from a medical journal, or a study with a sample size of over 1,000 diverse participants I’ll happily read that.

              I could make a website that contradicts everything in the one you linked and host that for free.

              Antibiotics save lives. Vaccines save lives. They are good things.

              • MaximilianKohler@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                It isn’t, and a random website isn’t a source

                So you clearly don’t understand how citations work. You shouldn’t even be engaging in discussions like this until you do.

                If you have an article from a medical journal, or a study with a sample size of over 1,000 diverse participants I’ll happily read that.

                Once again proving that you didn’t read anything you’re arguing about. You need to reassess your behavior.

                Antibiotics save lives. Vaccines save lives. They are good things.

                False dichotomy, further demonstrating your cluelessness.

                • NAK@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I know I’m not going to convince you, and that’s fine, but people like you get other people killed.

                  Steve Jobs infamously had a treatable form of cancer, but instead of going to a doctor and doing the scientifically verified treatment he ate fruit that some nut job said would cure him and he died.

                  The only medical advice anyone should ever give is go to a doctor. That’s it. Period. The end.