• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      64
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I don’t think the Spartan 6 can, it’s an fpga with no arm, the zynq can, there’s a lot of other arm chips that I assume can run some type of Linux, but the blurry ones are throwing me off

      Edit, top left is a 286 CPU, and the Intel one has an earlier date, so they MIGHT be able to runwalk it, it’ll be not good

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        428 months ago

        Not only could mainline Linux never run on a 286, it also definitely doesn’t count as an “SoC” to begin with. It needed a separate co-processor just to do floating-point math, let alone to manage all the I/O that a SoC does on-die.

      • amigan
        link
        fedilink
        English
        248 months ago

        286 Protected Mode is very different from 386 PM and there is no way Linux will would run on it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          118 months ago

          There is a project looking to do this kind of, known as elks that has images for 80286 chips. I have no idea why you’d want to do that to yourself though.

          • amigan
            link
            fedilink
            English
            78 months ago

            Interesting. Reminds me of PC/IX, and it probably similarly doesn’t even enter pm, judging from it running also on an 8086.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        20
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        this is extra tricky because they did not specify the exact kernel. mainline could be any of the kernels tagged as stable that you can build from linus’ git tree. i know that in the past you could run a mainline linux on intel 368 chips but today you probably can not because official support was dropped a while ago.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          88 months ago

          Part of me wishes I still had my families old 386 or commodore knock-off. Read some of the terrible short stories I wrote, play tanks. I remember when my Mom’s friend came over with a stack of 51/4 floppies and installed a program that played the Loonie Toons theme song with their logo and Buggs Bunny captioned saying “That’s all folks.” It blew my mind, video (sort of) on a computer, how was that even possible. I wondered how they got it to connect to the cable cause no way a computer could do that. Dang I’m getting old lol.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        98 months ago

        If posted in the right circles, this might motivate someone to get something on a Spartan 6 that runs Linux.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        68 months ago

        You can run a “soft” (semi-hard?) Processor on a Spartan, you could run Linux on that at least.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      398 months ago

      I just go by the colour - I don’t like the slightly maroon Qualcomm one.

      It’s like picking politicians but different - with then I go by their haircuts…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      18
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      With enough grit and time, yes :D

      Edit: ok not mainline, but Linux in some form or another anyway.

  • nifty
    link
    fedilink
    508 months ago

    What’s the test here? Prove you’re an embedded systems nerd?

  • Dandroid
    link
    fedilink
    358 months ago

    OH MAN. I worked on an Android tablet that used a rockchip CPU, not the one listed here but an older one (I think RK3026). What a PIECE OF SHIT. I don’t wish that tablet on my worst enemy. Battery life was like sub 2 hours with a 3200 mAh battery. Sometimes it would start running hot, and you could watch the batter percentage go down one percent every 10-20 seconds. The only way to break it out was to reboot it or let it die.

    We later upgraded our CPU to the 3288, one gen older than this one, and it was significantly improved, but still very entry level.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    178 months ago

    Anything that’s turning complete, has enough ram, and has a c compiler can run Linux. Theoretically, you could program a CPLD to run brainfuck and you could still run Linux.

    • @Tja
      link
      398 months ago

      The mainline part is key.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        228 months ago

        Yes. Any turing complete processor can perfectly emulate any other turing complete processor, whether it is x86, arm, or riscv. Mainline Linux can then run on this emulated processor without modification.

        • @Tja
          link
          48 months ago

          I guess it’s the difference of can today vs could if this emulator existed…

        • monk
          link
          fedilink
          38 months ago

          “boot” is the next important part. Have you tried reading it in full?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -18 months ago

            Emulated processors can do the same things as physical processors, including booting from disk.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              38 months ago

              Boot = Bootstrap

              If you’ve loaded up a virtual CPU first that’s not a boot of mainline Linux on the CPU.

            • monk
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              Yes, but it doesn’t count, because the SoC from the picture didn’t boot Linux, an emulated machine did.

              That’s why the records on doing this silly stuff on progressively smaller microcontroller use the word “run”. It has more transitivity.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                18 months ago

                I’m not sure I understand your argument. Are you saying that the emulated processor executes instructions while the SoC doesn’t? Every instruction that goes to the x86 is broken down into several SoC instructions, which the SoC executes in order to emulate what an x86 would do. Saying that the emulated x86 is booting/running Linux, but the SoC is not is like saying that computers can’t run java code, they can only run jvm.

                • monk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  18 months ago

                  I’m saying it runs it because “running” is transitive, but doesn’t boot it because “booting” is not. Similarly to how you can carry your grandkid by carrying your kid who carries their kid (carrying is transitive), but you can’t give birth to your grandkid by giving birth to your kid who’d give birth to their kid (giving birth is not transitive).

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    78 months ago

    I remember this captcha. I gave up after about the fourth round. The prize just wasn’t worth it, and I wasn’t on a machine where I could try scripting out a solution.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    28 months ago

    ARM really shot itself in the foot by making it so every SOC needs to have a custom OS image tailored to it. x86 meanwhile lets you pick a universal binary that’ll sort itself out at runtime