• PaupersSerenade@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    56·
    9 months ago

    So we should just let ‘minorities’ suffer? The term appeasement comes to mind, as I don’t know what else you could be advocating here.

    • IsoprenoidEnglish
      83·
      9 months ago

      Why not both? Benefit to minorities and benefit to majorities.

      This isn’t a zero sum game.

      • Glitchington@lemmy.world
        37·
        9 months ago

        Let me get this straight, if you have food to survive, and someone else who doesn’t have food wants some food, not even your food, just some food, you need more food before they get any at all?

        • IsoprenoidEnglish
          51·
          9 months ago

          Did … did you even read my post? What is going on?

          Let me re-write it using your analogy.

          Why not both? Food for minorities and food for majorities.

          This isn’t a zero sum game.

          • Glitchington@lemmy.world
            31·
            9 months ago

            Everyone should have food, my point is, the majority shouldn’t get extra food just because the minority are getting enough food now.