• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    425 months ago

    The timing is probably just coincidence. He probably submitted a bug bounty weeks or months earlier and it just now got included in release notes. 

    • gregorum
      link
      fedilink
      English
      205 months ago

      hush! we can’t our salacious headlines ruined with pesky details and nuance!

    • Lee DunaOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      65 months ago

      The timing is probably just coincidence. He probably submitted a bug bounty weeks or months earlier and it just now got included in release notes

      The fraudulent orders happened a few years ago, which was alleged recently

      The indictment states that the pair attempted to fraudulently obtain over $3 million from Apple through more than two dozen fraudulent orders. For orders that did complete, they obtained around $2.5 million in electronic gift cards and more than $100,000 in “products and services.” The scheme started in December 2018 and continued until at least March 2019.

  • squiblet
    link
    fedilink
    215 months ago

    Well, that was a pretty cluelessly written article. The two things are entirely unrelated. The headline seems to imply that Apple changed its mind about the fraudulent activity and was wrong, but that is not what the details support.

    • ditty
      link
      fedilink
      English
      35 months ago

      The article definitely could have been clearer, and the title is also clickbait. But what would be a better title? I tried drafting like 6 different ones and none were better.

      • squiblet
        link
        fedilink
        25 months ago

        I’d reverse it. “Security researcher who has been thanked by Apple for helping fix bugs in MacOS found to be a serial fraudster”

        Absolutely no reason to suggest that Apple “forgave” him, or that it was a mistake. I hate whoever wrote this article.

  • Optional
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -95 months ago

    What the fuck is that keyboard. Look, corporate news, if you want to try and be taken seriously you can’t use AI art. Point blank. Hear me now and believe me later.

    • Hotdog Salesman
      link
      English
      85 months ago

      That’s a normal keyboard, it’s just the hands aren’t placed where they normally are. I doubt it’s AI art.

      • Optional
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -25 months ago

        What the- ?? Do you see the ALT key in the middle of the picture? If that’s because the hands are wildly off center (which - wtf) then okay but that STILL doesn’t account for the “D” in the middle left being that far off. What’s that far off in the other direction, if this is supposed to be the center of the keyboard? Number keys? No. And that screen would have to be 22” long and 10” high if that was the case.

        These are clearly AI imaging artifacts.

        • Hotdog Salesman
          link
          English
          15 months ago

          It’s the right alt button. The one next to the space.

        • Optional
          link
          fedilink
          English
          05 months ago

          Ohhhhh okay. I didn’t know why people were upset about calling it AI art. AI people big mad. Sowwy AI peopow!! Go Go Magic Sexwar Robot!