• towerful
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    The only counterpoint i can see is that god is (honestly, at best WAS) infallible.
    So god made 2 perfect humans who cannot inbreed as there are no defective genes.
    At some point down the line, mutations came in and introduced possible genes that could combine/dominate to produce inbreeding.

    If we are accepting the premise of 2 original humans, why not 2 perfect original humans.
    If God made eve from adams rib, why not have them be genetically perfect.
    But Im sure there is some science i am missing where a huge genome analysis has shown that “perfect” genes have never or could not ever exist.

    And, tbh, this might as well be all science fiction based on a bunch of made up stories.

    • CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      11 months ago

      If I remember my hermeneutics, the canon is that essentially, God had “blessed” early descendants of Adam and Eve, allowing their children to thrive.

      It wasn’t until after the flood I believe that incest becomes more of a theme in the Bible, implying that they shouldn’t have children.

      But it’s been years since I gave this any serious study so I may be remembering incorrectly.

      • agent_flounder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        11 months ago

        It all makes more sense when you consider these stories in their historical social context. They’re a compiled bundle of stories from various religious traditions that were kind of grafted together to form one monotheistic state religion to help unify the country. So you find stories from both north and south Judah for example, the two creation myths in Genesis. And you see the monotheistic god referred to by more than one moniker because they were originally different gods.