• 1 Post
  • 30 Comments
Joined 6 months ago
cake
Cake day: May 13th, 2024

help-circle


  • GM: it rolls to attack. Oh that’s a 2

    Player: PFF easy

    GM: for a total of 47, dealing 70 damage and you are grabbed.

    GM: for its other 5 attacks …

    My favourite is its reflect ability. If the players pull some meta bullshit like dropping tungsten rods from orbit the tarrasque can just play an uno reverso card and nuke the players.


  • groet@infosec.pubtoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldMany such cases
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Never heard of iDEAL. Wikipedia says its a a Dutch system that was acquired by the “European payments initiative” last year. The EPI just became active as a payment system 1 month ago.

    This is VERY much still in development and not at all an established system in the EU.






  • Fines as a percentage of income is a good idea for individuals but I dont think it works for coorperations.

    A more reasonable approach is:

    • 100% of the money they earned/saved by comiting the crime
    • 100% of all damages caused to other people/cost to clean up results of the crime (includes the cost of investigation and prosecution)
    • a fine that represents the likelihood of getting caught. (If the crime earns me 1mil, the fine is 50mil but I only have a 1% chance to get caught, statistically I should commit the crime as many times as possible because I will end up wining in the end)
    • (optionally) a fine based on the crime. This one might be based on the size of the company. This is the “punishment” part. It probably should be payed by the individuals responsible and not the company.

    This third point is the important one. Cooperations comit crimes because they are reasonable monetary investments. If the expected fines are always higher than the expected earnings, crimes become a bad investment.




  • There is abig difference between those two games though. With bg3 you got a limited part of a story driven game. You could never reach “endgame”. It was a horizontal demo. You get everything until a certain point.

    With satisfactory the early access was the fully playable game from beginning to end. It is vertical. And since then they have just added more things. They will very likely keep doing exactly what they are doing now after the release. In one year the game will have more content than it does now and in retrospect, deciding which version in time is 1.0 is arbitrary.

    BG3 will not get a 4th chapter in a year.

    And games have been tested long before early access and similar models existed. Just because Bethesda can’t test their games doesn’t mean everybody else is shit too.





  • While I agree on the facts I want to offer a slightly different (possible) conclusion: a organisation like wikileaks needs resources and supporters. If they are targeted by all the “good guy”-countries and the only one willing to support them is “evil guy” Russia, then they are not in a position to resist. They chose to compromise their integrity instead of just not existing.

    If the western world wants a whistleblower/leaks organisation that follows journalistic integrity and ethics, they need to fund it even if it leaks their own internal documents.