• @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        422 days ago

        In the early days of C#, before it was called C#, Microsoft gave it the most Microsoft name ever conceived for anything ever: Visual J++

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            422 days ago

            update: i just looked it up and they are not. Visual J++ is a predecessor to C#. Nevertheless, the name “Visual J++” in all its Microsoftian goodness(?) is as good a descriptor as any for what C# turned into

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              322 days ago

              So more an iterative family member, which I suppose was more what I’d expect with how Microsoft hisorically handled programming languages. Still interesting! Thanks for the fact-check!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      422 days ago

      Me too. If I can use it, I prefer C# — that is — if I’m not doing systems programming, I don’t have to worry about legacy code, and mainly I’m supporting Windows then it’s really quite cozy.

      • @MajorHavoc
        link
        222 days ago

        That’s a solid description. I’m stealing that. “Cozy” is an excellent word for that sets C# apart from other languages.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      322 days ago

      I like C# too. I feel like I shouldn’t because of how Microsoft it is, but I can’t help but see it as a better put together/structured Java when I use it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        222 days ago

        I feel the same, but to me, it’s more understandable than the other C derivatives. I just understand it better. I’ve been thinking of diving into rust lately.