@[email protected] to Lemmy [email protected] • 29 days agoGrok do a goodlemmy.caimagemessage-square123fedilinkarrow-up11.56Karrow-down121
arrow-up11.54Karrow-down1imageGrok do a goodlemmy.ca@[email protected] to Lemmy [email protected] • 29 days agomessage-square123fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-3•29 days agoHow is that any different from anyone else buying their mistress expensive gifts?
minus-square@silasmarinerlink-7•29 days agoI think it’s just that having a mistress at all is generally frowned upon these days.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•28 days agoAs opposed to when it was socially acceptable?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•28 days agoAh, yes! The time of Louis XIV. Only for the King, of course.
minus-square@silasmarinerlink1•28 days agoNo, not really. Just meant that, like, it’s not really that it’s different to someone else doing it; more like, that it’s bad whoever does it I guess
How is that any different from anyone else buying their mistress expensive gifts?
Because it was to shut her up.
She wasn’t his mistress, for one.
I think it’s just that having a mistress at all is generally frowned upon these days.
As opposed to when it was socially acceptable?
Ah, yes! The time of Louis XIV. Only for the King, of course.
No, not really. Just meant that, like, it’s not really that it’s different to someone else doing it; more like, that it’s bad whoever does it I guess