• naonintendois
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    The author has no clue how spending works in cloud environments nor why it’s so complicated to calculate. This is a pretty uniformed article.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      Yeah, everyone struggles with that, especially since AWS doesn’t really break down costs in a way that makes sense if you’re trying to work out which business unit or feature is costing you money (unless you set things up where every team has their own account or whatever, and even then).

      I think Netflix could probably start selling their tool and make more money from that then streaming if they can get it to work, because I’m guessing AWS makes it hard on purpose.

      • custard_swollower@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Not sure what is hard in it - you need consistent tagging, and that by itself gives you a lot of mileage in cost explorer.

        • BlueBockser
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          13 hours ago

          That doesn’t work in all cases. I’ve recently come across two examples where we had a hard time explaining our costs even though we extensively tag and even have fine-grained AWS accounts:

          • Some costs can’t be tagged or at least not easily, e.g. custom CloudWatch metrics.
          • For some resources it makes a lot more sense to provide them centrally for multiple services at once, e.g. NAT gateways or load balancers.
        • c0c0c0@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Not only is that free, but I can’t imagine a better alternative. And they would have the same issue with allocation on prem. WithOUT tagging and Cost Explorer.

        • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Yeah, the actual headline to the article is “Even Netflix struggles to identify and understand the cost of its AWS estate,” which OP has very unhelpfully shortened to post “Netflix struggles to understand its cloud costs.”

          The word “Even” is doing a lot of work, and leaving it out changes the meaning of the headline.

            • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              14 hours ago

              Of course. But even for people who don’t read the article, it’s still best practice to just copy the headline from the article so that it’s the top of the Lemmy thread.

      • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I think Netflix could probably start selling their tool and make more money from that then streaming if they can get it to work, because I’m guessing AWS makes it hard on purpose.

        The company Cloudhealth Technologies has already been doing this for years, and not just with AWS but other cloud providers as well. Unfortunately they’ve been acquired by VMware so no idea if they’re still as good as they used to be…

      • theherk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        This just isn’t true. AWS is very clear about pricing and provides pretty good tooling for analysis. Complex infrastructure will have complex costs though. AWS has its problems a’plenty, but unclear costs isn’t one in my opinion.

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I agree, works fine for my stuff, but I’m pretty heavy on vanilla ec2, RDS, ec.

          I can see some people running some of the more complicated products and getting flustered. Some of the compound stuff where you’re paying extra transaction costs on top of the serverless things

        • jonne@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          So Netflix built this tool just for fun then? Obviously they feel AWS’ tools are lacking.