Easy questions have easy answers, right?

  • JackbyDev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    22 天前

    Well, in the example given they literally said not s good fit for your kind.

    • Nalivai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      22 天前

      But the stated reason for refusal will be “we have found a candidate that better fits the position”

      • JackbyDev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        22 天前

        It wasn’t in the example given, that’s my whole point.

        • Nalivai@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          22 天前

          It wasn’t. But the thing is, it’s only illegal if it’s the official reason for rejection. They can tell you in your face that they’re discriminating you, but you can’t do shit about it unless you get it in writing

          • JackbyDev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            22 天前

            Oh you have had mental health problems? I’m not sure we’re going to be a good fit for your kind…

            • Nalivai@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              21 天前

              There is a thing that people invented some time ago, it’s called lying. It allows for example for you to say something and then later pretend you didn’t say it. Wild stuff.

              • JackbyDev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                21 天前

                Are you suggesting people in the described scenario where they are directly and blatantly discriminated against shouldn’t act just because the interviewer can lie and said they didn’t? Because that’s awful advice.

                • Nalivai@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  21 天前

                  No, I’m trying to set some expectations. The right thing to do is to probably lawyer up and try to go after the company. But it almost certainly wouldn’t do anything, and it will be long, expensive, and ultimately pointless endeavor, best case scenario the company that hates you now will be forced to employ you.

                  • JackbyDev
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    20 天前

                    Zero downside to filing with the EEOC. https://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc-public-portal I view it like filing a police report even if you believe nothing will ultimately happen. Maybe they can establish patterns and go after them. Maybe it’ll at least tie them up. Maybe the person who did that will at least get reprimanded by their boss or at least think twice. You should never just roll over and accept abuse.

    • BussyCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      22 天前

      That’s the inside their head conversation the actual words would be a boiler plate rejection letter