Bold claims, but that energy density would be amazing.

  • Mihies
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s a PR number targeting average people.

    • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      A PR number would be “300% the capacity of current batteries with the same weight”. A mile range is just bullshit, and the “journalist” just parroted it out without second thought.

      • Jhex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        have you met muricans? you mention “capacity” and half would assume you are talking trunk space

          • Jhex@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Sorry bud but I think you are being pedantic here. It is basically industry standard (again, Murica driven) to advertise specs in whatever freedom units rubes would most easily swallow

            You are not wrong but you act like this is your first day finding out about marketing

            • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              I assure you I am not being pedantic. This isn’t a PR. It’s supposed to be a critical article about a PR. And it does a terrible job at it. And that’s what I’m complaining about.