• 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏
    link
    fedilink
    511 months ago

    How so? The message is safely delivered solely to the intended recipient, albeit in plain text (not private).

    If there’s anywhere that the commonly used email analogy fits, I think it would be here

      • @towerful
        link
        311 months ago

        I disagree.
        Users likely trust their instances admins

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          411 months ago

          Unless I run a Lemmy instance myself (which is possible), I have zero reason to trust an instance’s admins.

          Even if my instance’s admin happens to be the founder of privacyguides.org, that doesn’t mean he will never read any “private” messages (or be forced by someone else to hand them over).

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              311 months ago

              Even if I did fully trust my instance, I also would have to trust any instance I message with.

              I personally just use Lemmy for public comments.

        • __ol
          link
          fedilink
          111 months ago

          @towerful @booty Kolectiva revealed that might not be a great idea… Depending on how safely you want your data to be treated. Like it or not, it got seized by the US

        • booty [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          011 months ago

          What definition of safe are you using which makes a private messaging system without privacy safe? What would have to occur for it to become unsafe, if not being private does not make it unsafe in your eyes?