With, out, fail…

Also anyone got a new job available?

  • Dr. Wesker
    link
    fedilink
    English
    367 months ago

    I do this. I’m aware I do this. Yet I can’t help but do this.

    • threelonmusketeers
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17 months ago

      Same. I’ll have to try out the “I’m assuming everyone can see my screen” that many people are suggesting in this thread.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    187 months ago

    Jokes on you, I just say

    “I’m gonna assume everyone can see my screen… silence is golden”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      237 months ago

      That’s an important lesson from the early days of the pandemic: assume you’ll get zero reaction from the group, so set up your questions/requests/etc. in such a way that a non-response gives you the answer you want.

      “Okay I’m getting ready to start here, speak up if you can’t see my screen.”

      “I’m setting our target completion date for next Thursday. Anyone have any issues meeting that deadline?”

      “This new wrinkle seems like something that is mostly within the area of expertise of Bob’s team, so I’m going to ask that they resolve it before our next meeting. Bob, do you have any issues with adding that to your list?”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        237 months ago

        Only thing I do differently is throw that “Bob” at the start of the phrase instead of the end. Hearing your name triggers your brain to focus, so start with "Bob, let me know if you have an issue with this… Since XYZ is in your team’s area of expertise I’m asking that you resolve it by… "

        Saves a lot of time and embarrassment on the “sorry, I was multitasking, can you repeat that?”

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          17 months ago

          Oh god this. The number of times somebody says my name after the end of a long monologue is too damn high.

          Meetings are times when we’re doing double work—sitting on the meeting, and actually doing stuff. Don’t expect me to give you my full attention, you know full well that I’m working on things more important than you.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        17 months ago

        “Let me know if you can’t see my screen or hear me, or if I haven’t joined the call, or if you need me to be somewhere else than in this small cabin with no internet, electricity or running water a four days’ hike from the nearest trailhead”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    15
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I hate it so much. I always say “I just assume you all see my screen. As you can see…”. Screen sharing works in what? 99% of cases? We do not need to ask if everyone can see my screen and let 1-10 people answer that stupid question every time. The modus operandi is that this software works in the vast majority of cases and the recipients just need to know that I started sharing my screen and that it will in 99% of cases work just fine. Let them speak up for the 1% of times where it does not work.

    I am also a big fan of ending my emails with “A response is not needed”. Stop sending me replies with those stupid one line emails “Thank you so much for sending me what I asked you for… bla bla”. Not every emails needs a response.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      347 months ago

      Screen sharing works in what? 99% of cases?

      It works 95% of the time but it often takes 10+ seconds until everyone can see the screen.

      I get your point, but teams is such a broken mess that I think the question is legitimate. Half the time it doesn’t even register my microphone even if Windows doesn’t have a problem with it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          67 months ago

          That’s the exact opposite of what I’ve read in most linux threads on here. Most people seem to complain about teams not working at all under Linux.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          17 months ago

          I tried it about 2 years ago and it was a fucking omnishambles on Linux. I presume it has improved since then…

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          17 months ago

          My whole dev group uses Linux and Teams is a hot mess for us. We have to run the PWA through Chrome to get things to work and even then it’s hit or miss.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          17 months ago

          Wait, what? I thought they killed Teams for Linux a few years back. I’ve been piping my Webcam to a Windows VM just so I can run Teams and Outlook.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              17 months ago

              Nice! I’ll give it a try. I tried the web version through Firefox and it was unusable. I was able to join a meeting, but as soon as I turned on my mic, my opponents freaked out, saying their sounds were echoing back to them. Firefox + web teams was not doing any noise cancellation between speakers and mic.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Ooh, that’s a good suggestion to try, too! My specific problem with teams in the browser is the feedback cancelation bits. When I am unmuted, the people I’m chatting with hear themselves echoed. Using the full teams app in a windows VM with my webcam piped to the windows VM works fine. I’ll try the AUR teams first, but if that doesn’t work I’ll look into waydroid, too. Thanks!

      • AggressivelyPassive
        link
        fedilink
        67 months ago

        Honestly, Teams works pretty much flawlessly for me. It’s a resource hog and some actions (like switching between tabs) are inexcusably slow, but it works pretty well 99% of the time.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          27 months ago

          Maybe it’s because I have a pretty beefy work laptop but I rarely have issues with Teams. I dread Zoom calls, though. The video quality seems worse and whatever noise reduction Teams has doesn’t seem to exist on Zoom so it sounds bad, too. Not to mention the ugly interface

          That said I’ll take Zoom over webex any day. Thankfully Cisco is the only company I work with who uses it… And we make them use Teams when we host there meeting

          • Kallioapina
            link
            fedilink
            17 months ago

            It’s funny, I’ve very recently had pretty much the opposite experiences with the Teams/Zoom reliability.

            I had and interview project, and and in about 50% (around 15 out of 29-31, something like that) of the cases Teams calls failed pretty much in the beginning due to some technical problem, almost always the problems coming from the other end, on 1 case something unexplainably went to shit on my end (suddenly no sound or video), and I think of my self being pretty tech savvy on the user side. We had to fall back to phone calls for those “It’s just Teams, no problems, I understand” cases.

            In the Zoom calls, 5/5 worked without issues.

            Wonder why this is such recurring issue. I mean, havent Microsoft poured hundreds of millions of euro/dollars into the app/infrastructure? Where is the money going?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              17 months ago

              Could it be the way the system was commissioned? My company designs and sells conferencing systems so I’m 100% confident it’s been configured correctly. When we “take” clients from other companies, we routinely find issues.

              I don’t work on the commissioning/programming side of things (I’m in pre-install system design) so I can’t speak to the details. I just read the project close out reports sometimes

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      37 months ago

      That final one drives me crazy. My boss will respond to every email with a thank you. Why?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        77 months ago

        To acknowledge that they read it. Probably because that is what they want to see people do with their emails.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        17 months ago

        Outlook has a little emoji response feature. We seem to have taken to dropping a thumbs up for confirmation, heart for thank you, laugh when joke happens, etc. Works great

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      117 months ago

      It’s like a Digital Seance.

      Tom, Are you with us?

      Can you hear us Tom?

      Make a sound if you can hear us.

      We can’t see you. Can you hear us?

      Is anyone with us right now?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      57 months ago

      Steven?

      Yes?

      This is Clem Fandango.

      I know who you are.

      Can you hear me?

      YES I CAN HEAR YOU CLEM FANDANGO

    • AggressivelyPassive
      link
      fedilink
      47 months ago

      And the borg hivemind imitation when everyone has to greet everyone joining and 200 people keep saying hello in a way too happy manner for 5min.

  • TWeaK
    link
    fedilink
    English
    77 months ago

    In this day and age, surely someone can put this into a website and play the melody?

  • Herbal Gamer
    link
    fedilink
    77 months ago

    Let me pooooost aaaaa com - ment.

    Can ev - ery - one see my com - ment?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    57 months ago

    It’s missing the awkward pause where nobody can speak for “everyone”, so everyone is silent.